The MC in that Ken McGrath Youtube video that croppy_boy posted up.
I am indeed mbb. Iām disgusted at myself for allowing myself to be hornswoggled by gutter journalism. Lesson learnt and apologies to Magda if sheās reading this while queueing down at the labour exchange or walking along the beach.
thats paul collins that you are referring to
:lol:
[quote=āBishop Brennan, post: 646352ā]
thats paul collins that you are referring to[/quote]
Who?
Cian Healy.
it sounded like you were calling paul collins a cunt. he was in the MC in that video
Eamon Coughlan
Whats the story with international cunts? As Iād like to nominate Bashar Al Assad.
Iām fairly sure we made a ruling somewhere that they have to be Irish cunts, mate.
Thanks Dunph, I think this cunt deserves a thread of his own.
The GAA.
[size=3]I got to thinking about Ryan Tubridy and his place in the pantheon of cunts and I realised that he is not division 1 cunt material such as ubercunt Terry Prone and former winners;[/size]
[size=3]2008: BRENDAN OāCONNOR[/size]
[size=3]2009: GERRY RYAN[/size]
[size=3]2010: EDDIE HALVEY/ PAUL WILLIAMS[/size]
[size=3]2011: TERRY PRONE[/size]
[size=3]He qualifies more as a perpetual pain-in-the-hole. Taking that thought a step further I realised that we are lacking a ranking system for identified cunts and could use a supporting nomenclature. The nomination process is all very well but it has not been developed over the years and it is due time to step it up for the 5[sup]th[/sup] year of the prestigous title.[/size]
[size=3]While an ubercunt will win (see the evidence above), to be worthy of making the semi-final, the nominee really should be a proper cunt. However a lot of those nominated are really just pains-in-the hole and not worthy to share a page with the true professionals.[/size]
[size=3]Taking that another step, a ranking system develops along the lines of;[/size]
[size=3]Ubercunt = prospective winner[/size]
[size=3]Proper cunt = semi-finalist material[/size]
[size=3]Pain-in-the-hole = the field[/size]
[size=3]A strong adjudicator on the thread would bring a level of rigour to the process, would ask for a seconder where the nominee is a pain-in-the-hole but not proper cunt material and would keep a running total of the nominations per cunt through the year.[/size]
[size=3]We owe it to this magnificent contest to give it the support which has been earned over 4 years of cuntishness and bring it to a new level for the glorious Fifth.[/size]
[size=3]Your thoughts?[/size]
That anyone who uses the word āuberā is a homo
Celeb Spotting was a great thread until that Kilkenny cunt stuck his nose in starting to adjudicate where it wasnāt needed. Itās now one of those threads that clogs up the main board getting in the way of proper threads like the equine one. The COTY thread is excellent and reminds me of what makes TFK great, sharing the same opinion on here about a number of public figures that so many others seem to fawn over and love.
Introducing adjudication to the thread would dilute the value of it and inevitably turn people away from what is an enjoyable competition. The thread would descend into petty arguments about who is a cunt and who isnāt. Thereās a nice bit of banterology about voting on whoās a bigger cunt, the French bird Thrawneen slept with, or Terry Prone for example.
The cream will always rise to the top in these competitions as evidenced by this years final. I say leave it as it is and donāt ruin a quality thread and competition.
Just my ā¬0.02
Or German.
For me COTY should remain adjudication free. Democracy is always the best judge and as Mac says the cream will come to the top based on merit. Most people had forgotten who Emma-Louise the Frontline partitionist was for example and in an adjudication based system she may have been omitted. She only qualified on a countback after the first round but yet ended up just one vote short of winning it all. Democracy also gives the satisfaction to the eventual COTY of knowing that they truly have beaten all comers.
Jamie Heaslip.
I think CCHA should be commended for his thoughtful approach ot the Cunt of the Year thread and heightening our awareness of a thread that is unique to TFK and the very embodiment of what we are doing here.
However, I would tend to agree with Mac and Sid, in that there is an over adjudication of threads, usually by jumped up nobodies. Let democracy decide. I think in fairness, Sid did an excellent job of organsing the vote for 2011, and there was a worthy winner.
