2015 Club Championships - the lads are STILL at it

Sport
1623

Fuck forgot about him. Gifted.
Talk about a one man team.
More a specialist both Tom Sullivan would be up there as well.

In most cases i would judge a player on how much he can do on his own. Win his own ball, tackle, become a defender when needed or attacker when needed. Bring others into the game etc. Canavan was a classy player and he was tough as fuck in fairness and you could argue he can be in that kist i have comfortably enough depending on what you like in players but he lags behind a few in a number of departments.

Brian Dooher is my favouritd Tyrone player. And he coperfastened that when i met him at Tyrones 10 year get together (by co-incidence) for 2005 this september. He is an extremely nice guy and really is a student of the game. Cavanagh and Jordan are sound meb as well. But only Dooher for me is worth of the real top accolades. He evolved brilliantly and was more than the number on his back.

1624

You never saw these lads play. And even video is limited. So you are talking out your arse.

1625

Dooher for me aswell, his workrate and distribution to the other forwards was unreal and he could take a score, immense.

1626

Who was the cunt of the group, mate?

1627

How did you become the definitive arbiter of what “most people” think?

1628

Woah, I’m not the one who made the initial claim. I’m just disputing it, go butt heads with @Raylan if you want.

1629

You said his claim was rubbish and claimed the opposite. Who are you to speak for “most people”?

By the way, if there is a “southern bias” as you claim, and there are more people in “the south” than in Northern Ireland, then it is reasonable to assume “most people” think Fitz is greater than Canavan.

1630

You must have missed where I said I disputed it in my last post.

1631

Disputed what? That there are fewer people in Northern Ireland than in Ireland?

1632

I said I disputed Raylan’s post and I told to go and take it up with Raylan if you to pick an argument over unqualified posts.

Baffles me what your logic is here, take it up with him if it bothers you.

1633

Why did you edit the initial part of your post, @glasagusban?

1634

You said there’s a “southern bias” in favour of Fitz. There’s more people in the south. If you’re right then it stands to reason that “most people” favour Fitz over Canavan.

You also said that @Raylan’s contention that “most people” prefer Fitz is unqualified rubbish.

Which is it? It can’t be both.

1635

There is a southern bias towards the portrayal of players, Ulster players never get the credit they deserve compared to their Southern counterparts.

It is an unqualified statement unless you’ve undertaken a census on the population with respect to this matter, have you?

1636

This is going swimmingly

1637

I would call it an unqualified success on our behalf.

1 Like
1638

Makes sense that “most people” don’t give Canavan the credit he deserves so. In that case “most people” probably don’t think Canavan is the greatest. So you’re wrong.

1639

Have you undertaken a census to gauge that?

1640

You made the statement. Your reasoning doesn’t back it up.

1641

Don’t back away from what you signed up for. You are challenging me for calling a statement unqualified rubbish. Well, fucknuts, what have you got to qualify it? Stick to the base issue this time round.

1642

Let’s start with this: you don’t get to make an unsupported statement which stands as fact until someone proves you wrong. That is childish and dumb.

What I have is:

  1. There are far more people in “the south”.
  2. There’s a “southern bias” against Canavan and towards Fitz, according to you.
  3. If so, it stands to reason that “most people” favour Fitz over Canavan.

You’re either wrong about your “most people” contention, or wrong about your “southern bias” contention. Which is it? You can’t have both.