[quote=âlabane1917, post:1118, topic:16747, full:trueâ]
Many men simply donât appreciate that the life and health of every pregnant woman is potentially in danger.
[/quote]strong text
IV seen heavily pregnant women play camogie matches. no regard for life. So some are a danger to themselves and their unborns.
Are you saying theyâre not democrats?
Listen here Sid, late 60âs early 70âs it was a unionist government and their puppets in th RUC & B Specials denying & brutalising legitimate protest sparked the violence, which by the way you should also know was actually initiated by loyalists in false flag attacks (Silent Valley eg). Loyalists also killed the first RUC man to die. Burnt nationalists out of their homes and districts. Famously, graffiti claimed âIRA - I Ran Awayâ. When nationalists finally armed and defended themselves that was it. The genie was out of the bottle.
Your british govt has serious responsibility for the sequence of events as they allowed unionist domination in NI. No question about that domination was permitted in âthe mother of parliamentsâ as it was a matter for the Stormont (unionist) government.
Look, reverse the referendum decision. Then we can go with the economic argument\plan\opportunity that was first proposed nearly 300 years ago. It might even mitigate the worst of Brexit!
http://www.readwritethink.org/files/resources/30827_modestproposal.pdf
You have to wonder what goes on in his head
Iâm not sure what any of that has to do with the poster in question believing a war of extermination is an acceptable price to pay for a united Ireland.
Where?
It was clearly implied by him somewhere in one of those long, boring, meandering threads which also involved that far right nutcase who lives in Nebraska or somewhere.
There is no âbutâ for a united Ireland in his view.
That means, there is no price that is that not worth paying for a united Ireland.
Which is arrant nonsense only believed by the most fanatical of fanatics.
Where?
Use the search function. I couldnât be arsed looking. The important thing is I know what his views are.
You made the claim. Prove it.
Could you be more specific?
Here he is.
Ask him.
Is there any price not worth paying for a united Ireland?
Because thatâs what he firmly implied.
And to think otherwise apparently makes you Ruth Dudley Edwards.
You wonder what goes through his head, and all that.
Tut tut.
There you go again.
Prove it.
Do you believe that when a Trump supporter or an anti-abortion nut job shouts âSorosâ theyâre being anti-semitic?
Youâre obviously not familiar with the concept of the dog whistle.
Deflection. You made an allegation. Prove it.
Read on from here:
Fot @glenshane, there is no âhoweverâ in the quest for a united Ireland.
Use your imagination as to what that legitimises.
Youâre asking me to make your argument?
Make it yourself.
Did he ever promote " a war of extermination"? If so⌠where?
Youâre using weasel words to excuse an ethno-nationalist lunatic, mate.
Nope. Iâm asking you to justify your specific allegation.
Iâm actually a bit disappointed in you here Sid. Iâm on your side on most things but you gotta back this one up.