Derry Foley, I think was the chaps name. That was probably the last High Court injunction case, to get cleared to play. The DRA was set up shortly after that, to keep such matters out of court.
The World Series of Diarmuid Connolly Appeals was BOX OFFICE.
Wednesday night at the CHC APPEAL REJECTED
Thursday night at the CAC APPEAL REJECTED
Friday night at the DRA NO NEWS
4:37am Saturday morning APPEAL UPHELD
The sort of stuff that if there was an RTE Sports News channel in this country would have had Dublin supporters gathered outside the Hogan Stand slapping giant inflatable dildos off Marty Morrissey’s ceann.
Hugh was Senior Counsel for Paidi O’Se back in the mid 1980’s and sorted matters out when Paidi was floundering with pesky planning objections to his emporium in Ventry.
The DRA was the victim of its own success. It set very clear precedents for what constituted good disciplinary process in what were very clearly written judgments. The upshot was that all disciplinary bodies in the GAA learned how to follow due process and in that process the days of questionable decisions came to an end. As a consequence the DRA rarely sits now.
Correct. A DRA hearings panel typically populated by two lawyers and a lay person. For Dermo’s famous hearing, there were two lawyers (albeit solicitors) and Hugh as the layman. The other solicitor took his lead from Hugh.
But that’s not what the public wants. The public wants lots of questionable decisions and players and county boards bringing appeals to the high court and high soap opera.
Chaos over suspensions has always been an integral promotional tool for the GAA.
People don’t want utilitarian organisation. They want chaos and absurdity because chaos and absurdity is exciting.
That’s the first time he has reacted to a post of mine. He got very offended, and immediately resorted to ranting and raving. He then claimed that nothing would please me, even though I was pretty clear and consistent about what would please me in relation to the topic we were discussing.
It got a little out of hand when I made up a hypothetical scenario of his favourite plate being brought to the altar at his funeral. He got very offended, but then doubled down on claiming he was not in the least bit offended. I’d like to take my comment back and instead put forward an alternative hypothetical scenario of a caterwauling Imelda May bringing his favourite plate to the altar.
Based purely on how the onlookers divvied out likes during yesterday’s exchange, I’m claiming a resounding victory. I’m already looking forward to our next debate over a topic of interest and am quietly confident of following it up with another victory.