Just off the phone to a contact in Glagow who spent a good 45 minutes talking me through this story.
Article about it on the front page.
Missed the story on the front page Bandage but see it here now. Your speculation about Liverpool seems right - probably hoping to use them as a stepping stone but it just shows you until they sign on the dotted line nothing is certain.
I trust Strachan implicitly.
If he doesn’t think Torres is good enough for Celtic then he probably isn’t.
I heard nothing about this, it looks pretty certain that he’s going to Liverpool, medical passed and press conference today as far as I know
Too true Bandage. Geoff Horesfield is much better than Fernando Torres…
Torres is the poor mans morientes
fingal raven wrote:
Torres is the poor mans morientes
Highly unlikely that Torres could do any worse at Liverpool than Morientes did
Locke wrote:
Too true Bandage. Geoff Horesfield is much better than Fernando Torres…
Exactly - Horsfield is proven in the British game. Rather we get him than one of those overpriced Johnny Foreigners like Shevchenko et al.
Bandage wrote:
Locke wrote:
[quote]Too true Bandage. Geoff Horesfield is much better than Fernando Torres…
Exactly - Horsfield is proven in the British game. Rather we get him than one of those overpriced Johnny Foreigners like Shevchenko et al.[/quote]
What has he proven? That he’s muck/sh!te/not good enough for West Brom??? What was Larrson when you bought him only an unproven Johnny Foreigner…
Get real Bandage
Locke wrote:
Bandage wrote:
[quote]Locke wrote:
[quote]Too true Bandage. Geoff Horesfield is much better than Fernando Torres…
Exactly - Horsfield is proven in the British game. Rather we get him than one of those overpriced Johnny Foreigners like Shevchenko et al.[/quote]
What has he proven? That he’s muck/sh!te/not good enough for West Brom??? What was Larrson when you bought him only an unproven Johnny Foreigner…
Get real Bandage[/quote]
Look, all I’m saying is I think Horsfield is a far better player than Torres.