Don’t they have cubicles? What’s the issue?
Locker rooms.
No he said toilet.
Wouldn’t the ruling extend to locker rooms?
Here is @ChocolateMice’s question for you again: Are you happy for a man dressed as a woman to share a toilet with a young girl?
Milo has the left and right seething now 
He’s a shock jockey, a provocateur, an entertainer. Agree or disagree on anything he says, but he will make you think. But God forbid anyone would think, they must be protected from thinking or as MSNBC put it, we must teach what to think.
My two favorite Milo moments are people shrieking about him being a homophobe (he’s a gay man) and better yet… He got banned from Twitter!!! God I’d love to be banned from Twitter (I’m not on Twitter).
I’m pretty sure Choco means restroom as it is called here. And yes both boys and girls restrooms in schools have cubicles, and changing areas and often showers.
You don’t, so we’ve moved on. Do you have a problem with a transgender man using a female locker room?
Poor old @anon7035031 has been trying so hard in with his batshit crazy cliches for the last six hours.
He’s dug himself such a hole, he goes and defends a paedophile protector.
You wouldn’t expect any less from him.
You are getting more desperate by the post. 
Stop embarrassing yourself, you paedophile defender defender.
I refer you to this post.
Consider yourself clamped, unless you think retweeting a blatantly anti-semitic Twitter account called @White GenocideTM isn’t, you know, anti-semitic.
Which it would appear you don’t.
You’re boring the shit out of the forum. Let’s remember that you make racist jokes about Asians when you think it’s a bit of craic but you’re pretty fucking serious about taking fellas up on shit the minute it’s Trump related.
4 Likes
Boring the shit out of you: aim achieved. Your concentration threshold isn’t very high.
Now get back to fixing that vending machine. Letterkenny IT students will want their Mars Bars in the morning. 
this freak 
I’m sure the Trumpster will be straight on the blower 
1 Like
Good man @Sidney. Just feel it’s worth reminding you of your own racism every now and then when you’re up on your anti anti semitic high moral ground crusade. Carry on.
4 Likes
Just reminding you of this:
Not sure what bearing that has. Are you suggesting Laois people are a different race?
A different race to who? Why are you assuming that all Laois people are the same race?
That’s pretty racist.
I don’t what?
We were discussing supporters here, let’s park Trump for a second. You came out with this gem the other day on another poster.
You made a claim about “many” of Trump’s supporters being anti semites, an easy way to vilify a grouping of millions of voters. This was your “evidence”;
A one off example
I pointed out to you that this made up just 4% of Trump voters, pre supposing they were all Trump voters. It also pre supposes that all of those tweets were made by individuals, and not a smaller number of people repeating the same thing over and over.
You then claimed that Palestine had nothing to do with the tweets and that what actually constituted anti antisemitism couldn’t be questioned in the study, when in fact the tweets did mention Palestine. All this because it has been shown that Republican voters and by extension Trump voters are pro Israel. All here.
As I mentioned, Trump carried most normal Republic voters and it has been shown consistently by hard data that pro Israel. That was the only data we had about “many” of Trump supporters and attitudes to Judaism.
When your bluster had got you nowhere and your data/evidence to support your claim was proven to be rubbish, you came out with this;
A quite astonishing thing to say from someone who will whine about Trump acting on feelings, talks about fake news and claims to abhor anti intellectualism.
The reason for your hypocrisy? Because you want to vilify people as you have very little depth to your understanding of issues. It is your default when debating after you have googled your way to oblivion in trying to find some news article to support your political viewpoint. From whatever newsfeeds you follow, you see the latest bit of Trump bashing and that’s what you run with. Someone makes a claim about some of Trump’s team being anti semites? For Sidney this now shows that “many” Trump voters are antisemites.
You are the type of person who scours the top of the news, but never digs in. Someone in the Guardian tells you to by the latest from Piketty, so you do so. You might not even read the book, but it’s on your bookshelf to show people and you can look up someone else’s review of it when you want to debate online. If you had the personality for the airwaves or the tv, you could be a talking head on Newstalk or RTÉ and bluster your way into being perceived as being an expert on US Affairs by some moronic producer, but you would fail if you ever had to do some actual journalism.
This is why Trump gets away with misrepresenting things and telling some lies. Because people have seen through the bullshit peddled for year and just see someone now who isn’t skilled at lying, but comes off as more genuine a person than the suits and so called intelligentsia who have distorted facts and figures for years.
3 Likes
But we’ve already established many of Trump’s supporters are anti-semites. You tried to brush over that.
And now you’re tying to brush over his anti-semitism.
Do you think that twice retweeting a blatantly anti-semitic account called @White GenocideTM is something that would strongly indicate that person has racist or anti-semitic tendencies?
Your answer will tell a lot about you.