Were you in the pool with her Mike?
Chance would be a fine think boss
I had my first couple of pints of Guinness in several years last night.
The hotel room was septic with the stench of Guinness farts this morning
The missus wants me to have my bowels checked 
4 Likes
I’ve had to stop drinking Guinness because of this. Mrs Tassotti was horrified after our first few dates
3 Likes
Wait wait wait… Mrs Tassotti??
His mother
2 Likes
You hardly think he gave birth to fintan himself
2 Likes
An open relationship with his mother? Eeeek.
It’s a fluid situation. @Tassotti is free to be whatever he wants to be - he is all e-things to all e-men after all.
2 Likes
Might be better than a “ slammed door in face “ of mammy routine.
1 Like
Are you sure it wasn’t just Charleville?
1 Like
I’m fucking stink tonight
Goway and have a shite for yourself.
Kebab tray there. Sweet Jesus.
Where from?
Romayos
Jesus. That was lovely
2 Likes
It’s the most wonderful time of the year………for farts
2 Likes
Myself and 3 friends took a ferry to France about 5 years ago on a wine run and a bit of sight seeing around Normandy . After a few days on the piss and after seeing all the D day sights we decided to stop off at mont st Michael on the way back to the ferry home. Anyways as the 4 of us walked into a huge visitor centre which was packed with tourists from every corner of the world, I deliberately left the biggest stale booze fart I could muster which echoed throughout this huge concrete structure. Every head turned in disgust in our direction. The beauty of it was I had turned away from the lads as the fart bellowed out so they became the 3 culprits. I’ve never seen fellas turn on their heels so fast to get outa that building!
4 Likes
A senior British barrister who sued the Crown Prosecution Service for England and Wales after a colleague asked him to stop farting in the room they worked in together has lost his case.
Tarique Mohammed, who sued for harassment, told an employment tribunal that his repetitive flatulence was caused by medication for a heart condition. He said the comment from his colleague Paul McGorry was embarrassing and violated his dignity – but the panel found it was reasonable for McGorry to have asked him to stop.
The prosecutor, who had a heart attack in 2014, also alleged he was discriminated against because of his disabilities and made a number of further allegations against colleagues and bosses.
He claimed they threw away his water bottles, asked him to work one day a week nearly 100km away and failed to pay for his barrister’s practising certificate while he was on sick leave.
The claims of disability-related discrimination were also thrown out by the panel, chaired by the employment judge Emma Hawksworth in Reading, near London.
The prosecution service did accept that it treated Mohammed unfairly by not allowing him to work from home two days a week and leave work at 4pm to help him manage his condition, and by removing him from court duties, meaning he will receive compensation.
His heart condition meant he had to take daily medication whose side effects meant he had to remain at home for several hours after taking it. In 2016 he began sharing an office with McGorry, where the issue of his persistent flatulence was raised.
“Mr McGorry was aware the claimant had had a heart attack but he was not aware of what medication the claimant was taking or that flatulence was a side effect of the medication,” the tribunal was told. “There were repeated incidents of flatulence in the quiet room. On one occasion Mr McGorry asked: ‘Do you have to do that, Tarique?’”
Mohammed said that it was due to his medication and that when he was asked if he could step outside to do it, he said he could not.
In February 2016 he was moved to another team that meant he did not have to attend court and was asked to work one day a week in Brighton, more than one hour’s drive from Guildford, where he was normally based.
He launched a grievance, which concluded that the prosecution service should have made allowances for him, and went on sick leave. His employment was terminated in April 2020.
The tribunal threw out Mohammed’s claims of disability-related harassment and victimisation. “Many of the incidents about which [he] complains were unrelated to his disability … or were caused or aggravated by [him] overreacting,” the panel said.
Of the flatulence, the tribunal commented: “Mr McGorry’s questions to [Mr Mohammed] were not asked with the purpose of violating [his] dignity or creating such an environment. It was not an unreasonable question to ask, when there had been repeated incidents of flatulence in a small office.” –
1 Like