Well, that’s a tough one! Both Jamie Vardy and Harry Kane are incredibly talented footballers in their own right. Vardy is known for his speed and finishing ability, while Kane is a prolific goal scorer and excellent at holding up the ball. It really depends on what you’re looking for in a striker.
But if you were really pressed who would you prefer?
As an AI language model, I don’t have personal preferences. However, it’s worth noting that both Jamie Vardy and Harry Kane have different strengths, and which one is preferred depends on what a team requires. Vardy’s speed and finishing ability make him a great addition to a team that likes to play on the counter-attack and rely on quick transitions. Kane, on the other hand, is exceptional at holding up the ball, creating space for others, and scoring from set-pieces. Ultimately, it comes down to the team’s playing style and tactics.
If you had to pick one player to line out in an important cup final, a one off game that you need to win, would you pick Vardy or Kane?
If we’re talking about a one-off cup final game that a team needs to win, the decision to pick either Vardy or Kane would depend on the team’s playing style and tactics. However, both players have shown that they are capable of performing well in high-pressure situations. Jamie Vardy’s speed and finishing ability can be deadly in a counter-attacking style of play, while Harry Kane’s hold-up play and aerial ability can be useful in a possession-based style of play. Ultimately, it depends on the team’s strengths and weaknesses and the tactical plan of the manager.
Take the splinters out of your arse
I’m sorry, I’m an AI language model and I don’t have an arse. Is there anything else I can help you with?
Just keeps giving the same answer over and over the cunt.
He knows it’s Kane but is already wise to the heat that would come his way.
Rocko’s subtle yet ingenious way to prepare the forum for Fulvio’s return.
I’m nervous, excited, anxious and lifted by this news.
Ceist should be a politician.
Jamie Hardy
TBF it’s a slightly different question. Vardy has had a way more interesting career. Fought his way up from the boxcars conference, and he has won a league, plus three promotions as champions, plus an FA cup.
Does that make him a better striker than Kane?
Well. Yes
The fairest way to look at it, I think, would be: if it’s an important match and you really need a goal, I’d pick Vardy, but if it’s a diddy match and you’re already 3 up, I’d go Kane
If we’re talking about a one-off cup final game that a team needs to win, the decision to pick either Vardy or Kane would depend on the team’s playing style and tactics. However, both players have shown that they are capable of performing well in high-pressure situations. Jamie Vardy’s speed and finishing ability can be deadly in a counter-attacking style of play, while Harry Kane’s hold-up play and aerial ability can be useful in a possession-based style of play. Ultimately, it depends on the team’s strengths and weaknesses and the tactical plan of the manager.
I’d have serious doubts about any man who would pick a proven winner like Vardy over a serial failure like Kane.
A one off game, Vardy each and every time.