[LIST]
[*]http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/63181000/jpg/_63181848_john_inverdale_getty.jpg
[SIZE=4]John Inverdale[/SIZE]
BBC Radio 5 live presenter
Posted at
18:33
âA British sporting superstar is born, because this is the moment that heâll be catapulted into the British sporting conscience unlike when he won his previous two majors.â
[/LIST]
I wonder did the cunt know the Ulster final was on today.
[MEDIA=vine]M2m0pJn2wDm[/MEDIA]
[QUOTE=âbriantinnion, post: 986794, member: 6â]Little cunt just got someone else thrown out.
Some chap with an iPhone - he gestures saying âget these guys out of hereâ.
Nice that heâs focused on that kind of stuff so quickly after a win.[/QUOTE]
Heâs a bitter cunt, and the hate he has for the people of this earth will chew him up and spit him out.
Heâs a despicable, bitter cunt.
[QUOTE=âThe Scouse Cafu, post: 986826, member: 2660â]Heâs a bitter cunt, and the hate he has for the people of this earth will chew him up and spit him out.
Heâs a despicable, bitter cunt.[/QUOTE]
Heâs a Man U fan, what do you expect?
persistently coughing in his backswing apparently
What an utter fucking asshole. Probably had the kid thrown out too. Scumbag
An utter utter cunt, but if its knocked some sense into that young fella, heâs done him a favour.
Did he miss muchâŚ
So Sasha, what attracted you to the millionaire Rory McIlroy?
Apparently the rules of the tournament are that players canât sign anything until after they sign their scorecard.
So technically he was right not to sign the young ladâs autograph.
The issue here is that the rules of golf turn people who play it into cunts.
The cunt wore a tracksuit top to Stormont.
the wee bastard
[QUOTE=âPiles Hussain, post: 988536, member: 363â]Apparently the rules of the tournament are that players canât sign anything until after they sign their scorecard.
So technically he was right not to sign the young ladâs autograph.
The issue here is that the rules of golf turn people who play it into cunts.[/QUOTE]
Also how does that excuse the wanker swatting the young fella away?
[QUOTE=âKinvaraâs Passion, post: 988540, member: 686â]The cunt wore a tracksuit top to Stormont.
http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/76442000/jpg/_76442519_roryrobmcg.jpg[/QUOTE]
Proper fucking order too. Poor oulâ Martin doesnât appear too chuffed either it seems, but when youâre likely to encounter cunts like Robinson, Dodds and their ilk, apparrel isnât too important.
McIlroy doubtless wore a pair of Nike Air-Max to top the ensemble off. Wellingtons would have been more apt.
The cunt shouldnât be let near Dail Eireann without a suit. Wait, hold onâŚ
Like I said, golf makes cunts of people.
I suspect its a bit of a chicken or the egg scenario. Cunt is what cunt does.
GOLFER Rory McIlroy is entitled to see documents concerning fellow golfer Graeme McDowellâs involvement with a sports representation agency which Mr McIlroy is suing over a representation deal, a High Court judge has ruled.
Mr Justice Peter Kelly made the ruling when dealing yesterday with various pre-trial discovery applications in the action by Mr McIlroy challenging the validity and enforceability of representation agreements involving allegedly âunreasonableâ fee rates and commissions.
The case, against Dublin-based Horizon Sports Management Ltd; Gurteen Limited, with a registered address in Malta, and Dublin-based Canovan Management Services, is listed for hearing from January 27 next.
Mr McIlroy disputes claims he had a representation agreement with Gurteen or Canovan rather than with Horizon.
He alleges a representation agreement signed by him in December 2011 is not valid and is unenforceable on grounds including alleged undue influence.
He alleges the agreement resulted in his paying more than US $6.8m based on âunreasonableâ fee rates and the defendants are not entitled to be paid fees into the future related to his US$20m a year sponsorship deal with Nike.
Yesterday, Mr Justice Kelly also ruled that information from Mr McIlroy to the effect no data is available from various mobile phones held by him over a number of years, including a phone used by him while moving from one agency to another, should be put in a sworn statement.
While the defendants complained about the absence of data, and might criticise Mr McIlroy about this at trial, the court could do no more now than direct Mr McIlroy swear an affidavit concerning various phones and devices he had held, the judge said.
The judge also noted the court had been informed, because Mr McIlroy had not backed up his previous devices, no data on those could be retrieved.
The judge said he could not compel Mr McIlroy, as the defendants sought, to require his caddy JP Fitzgerald to produce any documents in Mr Fitzgeraldâs possession which may be relevant to the legal case.
It was open to the defendants to bring a non-party discovery motion seeking any such material from Mr Fitzgerald, he said.
Among some documents discovered were emails from businessman Dermot Desmond to Mr Fitzgerald, including an enclosure from Mr Desmond concerning legal advice, the court heard.
The court heard Mr McIlroyâs claim of undue influence is based on grounds including alleged representations by Conor Ridge of Horizon he would get similar representation terms to Grame McDowell.
Mr Fanning said his client had relied on those representations which turned out to be untrue as his clientâs terms were significantly inferior to Mr McDowellâs.
Mr McIlroy was also unaware, either when discussing the representation agreement with Conor Ridge in October 2011 or signing it, that Mr McDowell had a shareholding in Horizon.
Lawyers for the defendants previously told the court it was never represented to Mr McIlroy the terms to apply to him were identical to those of Mr McDowell. It was rather agreed the terms would be similar to those under an agreement with his former agent, International Sports Management (ISM), and he had indicated he was satisfied with that.
CiarĂĄn Lewis BL, for the defendants, contended there was a âstark lackâ of documents from Mr McIlroy in three categories crucial to his side, including documents leading up to Mr McIlroy signing a representation agreement in December 2011.
In court documents, Mr McIlroy insisted he had discovered what he could, that he rarely communicates in writing, had not backed up his phones and laptops and has no further documents.
His counsel Rossa Fanning BL said there was ânothing sinisterâ in Mr McIlroy regularly changing mobile phones and laptops. As a professional golfer in the public domain moving across different jurisdictions, Mr McIlroy has more reason than most to change his phone and having eight different handsets in a four year period was not unsual, he said.
Mr McIlroy should not be criticised because it was not anticipated a phone would be a source of âa battlegroundâ in the Commercial Court.
The defendants are denying Mr McIlroyâs claims and have counter-claimed for some US $3m dollars.
They alleged these are for outstanding off-course gross revenues and other sums allegedly outstanding under the December 2011 and a March 2013 agreement. They also seek damages for alleged past and continuing breaches of the agreements.
The judge ruled Mr McIlroy was entitled to all documents held by the defendants related to Mr McDowellâs involvement with Horizon, including concerning Mr McDowells shareholding in that company.
McIlroy has gone out of bounds. Cmmmmmaaaaannnnn.
And has responded with
Birdie
Birdie
Birdie
Back in your box
