and heâs such a nice fella. I canât understand it.
Just henderson and Clyne I reckon.
My point is Klopp took over titles contenders. No comparison with sir Alex.
I know but moysie wanted him as a replacement for Giggs
Why do you make up lies?
United were title contenders in 85/86, at one stage they held a huge lead, youâre wrong on that
They won the first ten games one year when Big Ron was in charge.
1 Like
Itâs a decent comparison - Fergie went out and bought about 10 players to win his first one⌠Klopp had to do the same with key players retiring and others wanting to move on. Fergie took over a team that finished 4th the season before he took over, Klopp took over a team that finished 6th the season before.
1 Like
Klopp took over title challengers and sold them all and replaced them with more expensive players. Heâs no conte who can come in and work with the squad and win a title. Itâs very twee how obsessed man united are with sir Alex and man united.
United finished in 4th place, 12 points behind the champions in the season before Ferguson joined. Liverpool finished in 6th place 25 points behind the champions.
Took Klopp a couple of years to win the Champions League.
Took Ferguson 13.
How does Conte get on in Europe?
So you are confirming Klopp took over title challengers. The bottler in chief retired Gerrard who cost Liverpool the league that year was gone. Itâs too easy to wind up Liverpool fans sometimes.
Terribly.
25 points behind the winners is hardly contender material. Itâs like calling United title contenders this year.
Liverpool fans donât know what they want. Apparently they spent no money. Then they are very similar to the man united team of the 80s who were apparently financially dominant at the time. Ye are all over the place.
Man united arenât 25 points behind. You seem upset by the fact that Liverpool were title contenders. Itâs utterly bizarre.
They were out the gate after 10 games that year and then they did a bottle job.
4 Likes
Correct.