Dear All,

Taking guidance from our respected rivals, bumping dormant threads is a bannable offence.

The Moderating Team.

Dont come down too heavy on us Bandage.

doubtful if consider us as rivals Bando

[quote=“Chavez, post: 734697”]Dear All,
Taking guidance from our respected rivals, bumping dormant threads is a bannable offence.
The Moderating Team.
doubtful if consider us as rivals Bando[/quote]

You haven’t been following the fortunes of the respective astro football clubs.

The freedom-loving forumites of TFK will never wear this.


Define dormant.

similar to your mickey, Fagan

<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:16px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial;]dor·mant<span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;] <span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;] <span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;](dôr<img src=“” alt="prime.gif]m<img src=“” alt="schwa.gif]nt)

<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;]<i>adj.</i> <div style="margin-left:1cm;]1. Lying asleep or as if asleep; inactive. <div style="margin-left:1cm;]<b>2. </b>Latent but capable of being activated: <span style="color:rgb(34,102,153);font-style:italic;]"a harrowing experience which . . . lay dormant but still menacing" <span style="color:rgb(34,102,153);font-style:italic;](Charles Jackson).</span> <div style="margin-left:1cm;]3. Temporarily quiescent: <span style="color:rgb(34,102,153);font-style:italic;]a dormant volcano.</span> See Synonyms at]inactive ,]latent . <div style="margin-left:1cm;]4. In a condition of biological rest or inactivity characterized by cessation of growth or development and the suspension of many metabolic processes. <div style="margin-left:1cm;]<strong>5.</strong> The state of an internet thread that, when bumped, makes Bandage look like an awful eejit.

Two foot long?

Chavez made that retort way too easy Fagan, but :clap: all the same! :lol:

What if the bump is relevant to the content of the original thread? E.g. A verdict given on a murder case that had previously been discussed?

We’d probably need Art’s guidance here.

In those cases send a PM to the mods asking for permission before acting.

I propose that where the purpose of the thread bump is to ridicule a respected member of the forum, then that should be fine.

I think that is far too clunky and square for legends like Flano who do their own thing Rocko. Maybe Flano should be exempt from any rules on here, I don’t think anyone would object to that.

I think the only possible solution is to appoint a Thread Bumping Adjudicator.

Has there been any chance in your stance on back seat moderation?

Sorry Mr Cahill meh I mean Bandage!

Surely this Billy da kid cunt has broken the new rules. Why not make an example of him?