Not Quite Lovely But Better than Rough(ish)

W_B_Yeats · May 18, 2009, 2:15pm

Are you not confusing reality with film?
He never struck me as the festive type

fistoffury · May 18, 2009, 2:20pm

[quote=“W.B. Yeats”]Are you not confusing reality with film?
He never struck me as the festive type[/QUOTE]

dunno he always struck me as fruity and he just took to that bareback role a little too comfortably.

Flano · May 18, 2009, 2:25pm

What has happened to this thread. Discussion on wheter someone is a Tony or not. Good god, good god almighty.

fistoffury · May 18, 2009, 2:28pm

thinly veiled i’d stick in in jake

Flano · May 18, 2009, 2:31pm

Thinly veiled “I can’t read english correctly”

Shadow · May 18, 2009, 2:33pm

I reckon Reese is pleasant enough.

fistoffury · May 18, 2009, 2:34pm

thinly veiled i can’t spell english words very well.

Flano · May 18, 2009, 2:36pm

Typos don’t constitute incorrect spulling

anon95599269 · May 18, 2009, 6:27pm

witherspoon

Bandage · May 18, 2009, 6:39pm

I think Reese is lovely myself. This thread will lead to debate aplenty.

The_Dunph · May 18, 2009, 7:09pm

Reece is above this thread. Admins ban Farmer immediately.

myboyblue · May 19, 2009, 12:50pm

This thread is made for Swank

count_of_monte_crist · May 19, 2009, 1:25pm

myboyblue · May 19, 2009, 1:52pm

Maggie is in.

Shadow · May 19, 2009, 1:57pm

Not too dissimilar …

myboyblue · May 19, 2009, 2:08pm

If thats Dunst, I have a mental block to her, I think she’s mank.

Shadow · May 19, 2009, 2:10pm

I think “mank” is a bit harsh, but this is the “Not Quite Lovely But Better than Rough(ish)” thread.

myboyblue · May 19, 2009, 2:22pm

Dunst is barely fit for the rough.

Like I said, a block when it comes to her.

farmerinthecity · May 19, 2009, 9:21pm

Maggie is fairly made for this thread I would say.

Witherspoon isn’t lovely enough for me for yon other thread.

Decent but plain.

Sidney · May 19, 2009, 10:45pm