Take that logic to it's conclusion, and nobody would ever do anything by themselves without supervision.
Now that's a recipe for a rather closeted life.
There is plenty of "evidence" for pretty much everything you can think of. Ironically you're probably the best advert yourself for supervision - you really should be supervised when you use the INTERNET given that you clearly lack the critical filters to distinguish between real evidence and "evidence" you want to believe - hence your beliefs in theories such as "big pharma" having a cure for cancer but suppressing it.
Your reliance on having to make ad hominem attacks to try and win the argument is noted, as always.