Thatâs your view and while youâre entitled to it you donât have the right to force it on anyone.
Actions have consequences - thatâs not an opinion. People who have sex know the risks involved.
You seem to saying that it is ok for people not to be accountable for their actions.
What consequences should a rape victim suffer?
I mentioned people having sex, not those who are raped.
Why should a woman carry around a dead foetus ?
Who mentioned dead foetus?
You were advocating killing babies a few posts ago.
I never advocated anything. I said people in extraordinary circumstances should be allowed choose instead of being berated by loopy god botherers who wonât be around to live with aftermath. Unfortunately for you the church no longer dictates to people and itâs only a matter of time before abortion is legalized⌠but the legislation and laws around it require very serious debate. While you maybe a keyboard warrior, there are also many who are willing to express your stunted views in public that will end up leading to half measures and the continuation of thousands of women having to go to England yearly.
Maybe they should consider all the consequences before having sex.
Fantastic post @Locke. Somebody had to ask the question and if it wasnât @ChocolateMice it wouldâve been me because I have very conflicting views on this issue, even in my own mind.
But you fielded the issue exactly how I expected you would, pure gentleman with a heart of gold
3 Likes
As I suspected. Youâre only interested in language games and trying to move the parameters to a boxed off black and white version of the world that only exists in your head. You might think this is clever, but it paints you as ignorant.
Iâm saying thereâs no point playing the sympathy angle on people who want to abort a child because they might be a bit more hassle in their life that they thought.
You seem to think itâs OK.
For the last time I said in extraordinary cases, such as Trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome), parents should have a choice - Thatâs hardly the âsympathy angleâ or a âlittleâ bit of âhassleâ.
I suspect the real issue here is your ignorance. You donât have sex, you canât communicate with women and you idolize sodomy⌠Youâre hardly a voice of authority on procreation and having children.
Itâs not about they want, itâs about the life they are choosing to end.
Itâs not their decision to play God.
What are you on about a god for?? Thatâs the second time youâve used that word like it carries some sort of conviction. Religion is a personal belief - not a fact - and itâs not something that can be forced on others. The term âgodâ has no place in an argument about anything. Millions of people donât believe in god and are as right and correct in their assertion as people who do believe.So Please leave your fairy tales out of this thread.
1 Like
You donât believe in a God but you believe in a personâs choice to choose who lives and who doesnât live? What gives them the right to play God?
How can people play at something that doesnât exist?? That makes no sense?
Do animals have a right to life or is it something just reserved for humans?
Thatâs your your bigotry talking.
You cannot disprove his existence?
The onus is on you to prove it ---- If I went around saying I met the man in the moon and he granted me three wishes I think the onus would be on me to back up my story not on others to disprove it.
Humans are Godâs greatest creations. You think people have a right to choose who lives and who doesnât, I donât - only God has that right.