She saw the movement.
That’s all.
1 Like
Most people wish you would go away.
Majority is most. You seem to be having problems with basic comprehension. There are only two outcomes, resistance or passive, in the majority of rape cases, victims are passive - from the mouth of the defence team’s expert witness. Black and white.
did she say she saw penetration?
there are dozens of acts that could be classified as ‘sex’
very graphic evidence this morning, some lads here will enjoy it id say
It’s not. A majority can be 50.00000000001%
Most would mean nearly all.
The irony of your calls for education get heartily laughed at when you back yourself up this way.
One interesting piece from yesterday was that Jackson got a hard on once she started giving him a blowjob. A reasonable thought was that he was too drunk and that’s why he wasn’t having sex when the witness 100% believed he was but that now presumably has to be discounted as a reason.
Unsurprisingly, your command of a general everyday word is appalling.
Roz getting the sly digs in whenever she can;
1 Like
You’re not exactly covering yourself in glory there ffs 
From the movement.
She also could see only one of Paddy Jackson’s arms.
Why did you edit my post?
I don’t!
I didn’t. More lies from you.
She is 100% certain of what she saw.
She was a sober, independent witness.
1 Like
“Jackson was on his knees at the the foot of the bed, she had her bum up and Jackson was penetrating her with his penis.”
You did. Once again your contributions are only to frustrate and deflect from the subject matter.
She was. She saw a threesome.
Case closed.
I didn’t, you edited it yourself and are now telling lies to deflect.
1 Like
Case closed.
Most rape victims are passive, something the defence team confirmed. The witness confirmed their were no signs of positive consent.