…and virtue signalling
It would be presumptuous to think they won’t try it.
Putin is now launching into a full scale Nazification of Russian society with the ultimate goal being the military conquest of the entirety of Europe. He has a very powerful ally.
Our politicians in the west would want to start dropping pointed references to us having lots of nuclear weapons into interviews and speeches etc.
As it is, public attention in the west is already beginning to drop off, and companies are already finding ways to cock a snook at the sanctions.
Miriam on Prime Time here basically pleading with some Ukrainian government official to surrender. He doesn’t seem very impressed with her line of questioning. Bringing up Irish history. Miriam counters with her beloved Good Friday agreement. Bit awkward all round.
Surrendering mightn’t be so simple. Zelensky was either unwilling or unable to rein in his own forces prior to invasion. If he gives in now he’ll have have various factions to contend with and he’ll certainly be at odds with some of them. Hilary clinton fancied an insurgency, she could easily get it along with a civil war.
That reminds me of Ardboe vs Moortown …only with survivors
I’m asking you for a link to evidence of Azov killing Ukraine civilians - where is your evidence.
Divisive for who and who will it be controversial for? We are an extremely rich country with loads of space. Absolutely give them all citizenship if they want. Why wouldn’t we? Correspondingly anyone who objects should be fucked off out of here. No one will miss them.
That’s not how things work at the border mate. There are already people with sketchy links to the Ukraine arriving from places like Gran Canaria saying they need help. They’re a tiny minority but it’s happening.
Like it or not no nation on earth can give everyone asylum, and far from all asylum seekers are genuine
Well said - the fucking greediness of these cunts acting like they aren’t living on one of the richest planet on earth.
Killing Ukrainians when? Prior to the invasion or since?
And millions of other peoples lives moreover.
Every country on it not only can, but is required to give asylum to every genuine refugee.
After that it’s a short path to citizenship anyway.
May be a few false claims to weed out but as you said, a tiny minority. And I said nothing about them, I said we should should welcome in refugees. We get a tiny a proportion of them anyway, the racism and miserliness of anyone suggesting we should turn away anyone fleeing war beggars belief.
Prior to this conflict that is simply not true.
Are you kidding?
The reality of the refuge crisis is that the majority of the present refuges are from areas occupied by Russia, and in my opinion most of these areas will not be handed back at the end of the war. So unless NATO move in to sort it all out, I generalise in saying must countries will have to cater for what they currently have, and more.
As I posters above, there needs to be a solution, however bad it might be.
You need a solution “ however bad it may be “ to solve a refugee crisis.
A solution to stop war crimes or refugees coming to Ireland?
Didn’t seem much chat about solutions before refugees arriving happened, eh?
By European standards, yes it is.