I only remember two instances of teams scoring 30 points plus pre 2005. Both were in games that were brutal mismatches and both were in 1982. Cork 5-31 Waterford 3-6 and Kilkenny 7-31 Westmeath 0-9. The other high profile one was Kilkenny 3-30 Waterford 1-13 in 2008. Even as late as 08 30 points was an outlier.
Does anyone else think the bigger difference rather than the weight of the ball is that hurleys have improved so much? I remember looking at old games over lockdown and from time to time lads would hit the ball as far as lads could hit it now but it was just harder to hit the sweet spot with the hurleys back in those days
Game as changed to a possession style game. Less goals are created as ball is not moved quickly as teams are scared to turnover the ball. It has become a game driven by statistics and influence of other sports.
âWasâ I suppose. I have only one here in the house. Signed by The King himself. Itâs been indoors now for so long itâs bone dry and as light as a feather. I took it down off the top shelf to compare it with the modern ball, but there is no great size difference. So it must have been the water absorption.
That light Cork forward, Seanie, 99 team, training teams now. He used to use old camogie sticks as they were light but they looked more like hockey sticks. Hurls must be an issue alright.
First ones I remember really different were the OâConnor Newtown ones, light but with a big bas. With the suitability for the Cork style of the time, think they were the game changer. I think youâd see more goals with a heavier ball now, but lads would still exert serious control and short passing would reign, just fewer distance points.
Itâs the sliotar. Not just the size but what itâs made of. Itâs much lighter. Ribs are much smaller so easier to strike it accurately. Fresh ball every puckout not one for the whole match like it used be in my day.