You truly are the most repulsive wankstain on this site.
Well, Iām not a terminally angry, humourless, racist, politically extreme nutcase like you, and thatās just for starters, so your statement is obviously wrong.
Go fuck yourself, you worthless piece of shit.
cc: @ironmoth - labane is displaying sexual deviant tendencies here, at least according to your ultra-literalist interpretation of the English language.
I reckon the DUP lit that fire in the West London tower block.
If this chap turns out to be a supporter of Bernie Sanders, itās about as relevant to this attack as Salman Abediās support for Manchester United was to him blowing up a load of innocent children, women and men.
There are nutcases of all shapes, sizes and mindsets and no politician on earth is immune from having one as a āfollowerā.
What we can say for certain is that Bernie Sanders has at no stage ever used rhetoric which can be construed as incitement to violence, especially gun violence.
That hasnāt stopped you trying to link him to this attack for your own nefarious reasons, ie. you donāt like him, in fact you hate him, so letās try and smear him.
Your modus operandi is straight from the gutter, the same kind used by The Sun and the Daily Mail to try and smear Jeremy Corbyn. Thatās no surprise to anybody familiar with your posting style.
You tried this before here and were caught out telling porky pies.
What we can also say with with certainty is that no Republican party politician or supporter is any position to go around throwing smears at opposition politicians in such a manner, given that the Republican party has given long-running, uncritical support to the gun lobby, including allowing mentally ill people to buy assault rifles without background checks. No gun massacre, including Sandy Hook, has moved them from that position.
Republican rhetoric has always been a dog whistle to the nut job militia brigade who still think itās 1837 and promote the utterly insane idea that all government is tyranny. As I previously wrote, that only holds up in practice when itās a Democrat.
And for a Trump supporter to try and smear Sanders and moaning about āhateā from āthe leftā, well, sorry, but I almost fell around on the floor laughing at that, for reasons obvious to anybody with an IQ above 80.
I donāt remember you coming on here to express your outrage after the Quebec mosque massacre, despite the clear and obvious link between that incident and the type of right-wing hate speech that Trump engages in.
Thatās the thing that really gets you.
You know full well thereās a clear link between that type of right-wing hate speech (which you also regularly engage in - itās pretty much your entire method of ādebateā) and incidents like the Quebec mosque massacre.
And you also know that thereās no link whatsoever between this sort of attack and anything Bernie Sanders says or has ever said.
Thereās a clear difference which you know exists, but, instead, you choose to engage in false equivalence - actually, itās not even false equivalence - itās outright denial and deliberate twisting of the truth in an attempt to āwinā an argument on the INTERNET.
Thatās the sad world you inhabit.
I reckon it was that residents group.
Letās not rush to blame the democrats for todayās terrorist attack.
However, it should be a lesson to the extreme left and the fake news networks.
Iām not a Trump supporter and didnāt vote for him, but I will defend those who support him and voted for him from nutters like yourself. Nobody has spewed more vitriol in their direction than you, so enough of the faux outrage.
Obviously there is hate on the right and the left, one of the responsibilities of a politician is to defuse hatred. Calling for a secure border and making it difficult for criminals and potential terrorists to enter the country is not hate speech. Calling half the country deplorables is a lot closer to hate speech than targeting those who wish to harm others. You donāt live here, but the hate directed at conservatives currently is quite intense, it isnāt safe for example to openly declare as a conservative on many campuses these days.
I certainly donāt hate Bernie Saunders, I may disagree with his economic policies (and the hypocrisy of them, labeling millionaires as the problem, when his own income was over $1M in 2016), but I think heās a decent person and politician.
Labeling everyone who disagrees with you racist and extreme doesnāt help your argument, it just exposes you as a nutter.
Any reasonable and balanced individual will be thinking along the same lines.
Have you seen the triumphalist āI told you soā statements from them ?
If you can find sexual deviant tendencies in someone telling you to go fuck yourself and calling you a worthless piece of shit, thereās not much that tagging me is going to do for you.
Youāre a bizarre fucker Sid, but I honestly would hate to think youād hurt yourself or damage your real-life relationships because of an internet addiction, or whatever it is that causes you to fight with the world and its mother online.
Iām not a Trump supporter and didnāt vote for him, but I will defend those who support him and voted for him from nutters like yourself. Nobody has spewed more vitriol in their direction than you, so enough of the faux outrage.
I give facts as regards Trump supporters. And the facts state they are motivated by race more than any other politician in living memory in the US.
As regards Trump himself, damn right I despise him. Thatās because he is a preacher of hate and drives a coach and horses through every value any civilised person should want in a politician.
Whereas the likes you of preach hate due to your ideological aversion to do with anything to do with any sort of progressive politics.
Obviously there is hate on the right and the left, one of the responsibilities of a politician is to defuse hatred. Calling for a secure border and making it difficult for criminals and potential terrorists to enter the country is not hate speech. Calling half the country deplorables is a lot closer to hate speech than targeting those who wish to harm others. You donāt live here, but the hate directed at conservatives currently is quite intense, it isnāt safe for example to openly declare as a conservative on many campuses these days.
Iāll presume you just got back from Mars, or Germany 1938.
I certainly donāt hate Bernie Saunders, I may disagree with his economic policies (and the hypocrisy of them, labeling millionaires as the problem, when his own income was over $1M in 2016), but I think heās a decent person and politician.
Sanders is a deluded nutcase.
Labeling everyone who disagrees with you racist and extreme doesnāt help your argument, it just exposes you as a nutter.
Thatās exactly what you do.
I donāt throw around cheap insults for the sake of it like you do.
When I call somebody something, itās because itās clear they are such.
Youāre both a racist and a far-right mentalist.
Iām quite happy with my moderate, reality-based politics, thanks.
If you can find sexual deviant tendencies in someone telling you to go fuck yourself and calling you a worthless piece of shit, thereās not much that tagging me is going to do for you.
But Iām not the one who finds sexual deviant tendencies in such language, mate.
Youāre the one whoās proved they have the problem with that.
And your political views strongly tie in with such.
But Iām not the one who finds sexual deviant tendencies in such language, mate.
Youāre the one whoās proved they have the problem with that.
And your political views strongly tie in with such.
Ah, are you on about the post I threw together with all your dick and ass references? Sure I was only razzing you. Donāt take it so seriously, you flute.
As for my political views; what exactly do you think they are?
Ah, are you on about the post I threw together with all your dick and ass references? Sure I was only razzing you. Donāt take it so seriously, you flute.
Small bit late to try and claim that when youāve been crying like a bitch any time I tag you for months now, mate.
As for my political views; what exactly do you think they are?
Have you asked @anon7035031 yet? Heāll tell you and youāll repeat them.
Small bit late to try and claim that when youāve been crying like a bitch any time I tag you for months now, mate.
Iāve turned the other cheek. (Face cheek by the way, not ass cheek.)
Well said
OMG, the terrorist today in the US may have ties to the Democratic Party. He was strongly anti President Trump
Terrible state of affairs.
Fucksake, nothing is sacredā¦