Kev would have been a Nazi collaborator.
Go back, read all the posts and try and find a bit of context.
If you have any problems come back to me.
He would have done the dirty work for them. I think âuseful idiotâ is the description.
I have no idea the reference you are trying to make Brian.
I think you need to look up exactly what worldly means in all its derivations because Iâd say itâs the last thing youâd like to claim to be
[QUOTE=âJulio Geordio, post: 1068459, member: 332â]
Some serious backbone there Kev. Thank fuck we arenât reliant on the likes of you to maintain our freedom of expression.[/QUOTE]
Just as well weâre not relying on you to write and teach history books.
[QUOTE=âcaoimhaoin, post: 1068456, member: 273â]So what? There was free speech in the states in the 60âs when the KKK were killing blacks. There is free speech in Australia right now where they are killing aboriginals.
Wake the fuck up you tool.[/QUOTE]
Itâs not even whataboutery, itâs pure drivel.
Fortunately for the âblacksâ they werenât afraid to fight for what they believed in. Kev would still tending his masters crops if he was a blackman.
âI say, I say I donât like this slavery, but best know my place in case I be shotâ
[QUOTE=âcaoimhaoin, post: 1068439, member: 273â]Not really no. If they were telling the truth about some story or uncovering some corruption or getting an important story out there then yes. But they were mocking a whole race, putting others in danger as well as themselves.
I would say itâs pretty fucking stupid.[/QUOTE]
Now kev, would you not consider that shooting 12 people dead over a cartoon is just a tiny bit of an overreaction. Maybe publishing a cartoon mocking the French or French Christianity might have been a more suitable and proportionate response?
[QUOTE=âJulio Geordio, post: 1068469, member: 332â]Itâs not even whataboutery, itâs pure drivel.
Fortunately for the âblacksâ they werenât afraid to fight for what they believed in. Kev would still tending his masters crops if he was a blackman.
âI say, I say I donât like this slavery, but best know my place in case I be shotâ[/QUOTE]
Kev = Uncle Tom, which is just about right for a Cork person really.
[QUOTE=âThe Selfish Giant, post: 1068441, member: 80â]Conveniently blaming âreligionâ or âIslamâ for such attacks lets the West off the hook. The narrative being that those responsible are motivated solely by âan evil & ignorant religious ideologyâ & are not in any way retaliatory acts against Western involvement in Islamic countries, borne out of desperation.
When a few Muslims launched an attack against the World Trade Ctr. âThe world is shocked & appalledâ by the âworst act of wanton terrorism the world has ever seenâ etc etc. But when George W Bush & Co, unleash âShock & Aweâ on the innocent civilians of downtown Baghdad & slaughter upwards of one million Iraqi civilians, that isnât âterrorismâ & anyway a million dead Brown-skinned people counts as nothing when compared to three thousand Americans.
It seems the West (read USA, UK, Israel) has the right to bomb, pillage & occupy, anywhere in the world that it sees fit to do so. It has a god-given right to slaughter & maim, with absolute impunity.No-one could possibly have any legitimate right to retaliate. Including the millions of Palestinians forced to exist under the yoke of Jewish oppression.
The very same narrative was used to de-legitimise the Irish republican struggle in the 1960/70s. The message being that it was all over religion. The Irish were predisposed to violence & thus had no justification or political merit.
Apart from everything else, this attack in France has Mossadâs fingerprints all over it. Itâs convenient too - considering Netanyahu was promising Islamist attacks in France, just last week.[/QUOTE]
Richard Barrett has the same nonsense up which is easy to write from a western democracy - if history shows anything it is that extremists donât respond to appeasement. If Israel is an apartheid state how does he think a global Muslim state would treat non Muslims
there is a Holy War coming
âThe French killings are a tragedy. No journalist should be murdered for reporting. The Western ruling class bears responsibility for this - as long as they are bombing thousands to death, maiming children and murdering civilians in the Middle East, as long as they continue to support the rotten Apartheid state of Israel, as long as they continue to scapegoat minorities to distract people from their greed - as long as all these outrages continue desperate people will commit acts of stupid cruelty in return. No victimisation of Muslims in response.â
Here is a few descriptions, Iâm happy enough with them
[SIZE=3]noun[/SIZE]
[LIST=1]
[*]experience of the world that makes you difficult to shock or deceive
[/LIST]
adj.
Experienced in the ways of the world.
[QUOTE=âJulio Geordio, post: 1068469, member: 332â]Itâs not even whataboutery, itâs pure drivel.
Fortunately for the âblacksâ they werenât afraid to fight for what they believed in. Kev would still tending his masters crops if he was a blackman.
âI say, I say I donât like this slavery, but best know my place in case I be shotâ[/QUOTE]
One of those gentrified black slaves who spent a few years on one of those Erasmus type exchange programs at Oxford or Cambridge ??..
Where did I say it was not an over reaction?
Donât make a clown of yourself twice today.
Ah this is just sublime 
[QUOTE=âTheUlteriorMotive, post: 1068472, member: 2272â]Richard Barrett has the same nonsense up which is easy to write from a western democracy - if history shows anything it is that extremists donât respond to appeasement. If Israel is an apartheid state how does he think a global Muslim state would treat non Muslims
there is a Holy War coming
âThe French killings are a tragedy. No journalist should be murdered for reporting. The Western ruling class bears responsibility for this - as long as they are bombing thousands to death, maiming children and murdering civilians in the Middle East, as long as they continue to support the rotten Apartheid state of Israel, as long as they continue to scapegoat minorities to distract people from their greed - as long as all these outrages continue desperate people will commit acts of stupid cruelty in return. No victimisation of Muslims in response.â[/QUOTE]
But you are saying our wrong is better than their, potential, wrong.
Thatâs just your fear speaking.
WORLDLY
[LIST=1]
[*]1.
of or concerned with material values or ordinary life rather than a spiritual existence
[/LIST]
[QUOTE=âcaoimhaoin, post: 1068480, member: 273â]But you are saying our wrong is better than their, potential, wrong.
Thatâs just your fear speaking.[/QUOTE]
Every Western media outlet and newspaper should publish those cartoons tomorrow.
this is a religious war as it is a war that is not about borders or nationality
[QUOTE=âcaoimhaoin, post: 1068477, member: 273â]Where did I say it was not an over reaction?
Donât make a clown of yourself twice today.[/QUOTE]
Now Kevin you did say that they were pretty stupid for publishing cartoons and that having published cartoons an attack âwas bound to happenâ. I would suggest that in a reasonable society that kind of reaction is an overreaction.
Would an attack on Channel 4 have been bound to happen because the fundamentalist Catholics of Ireland were outraged by Father Ted?
[QUOTE=âRichie Mac an Breathnach, post: 1068323, member: 2646â]Nuke Mecca[/QUOTE]I dream of the day
I was going for more of a foghorn leghorn Deep South kind of thing