Terrorism Thread. The terror of another nembo kev thread

Current Affairs
162

[QUOTE=“caoimhaoin, post: 1068456, member: 273”]So what? There was free speech in the states in the 60’s when the KKK were killing blacks. There is free speech in Australia right now where they are killing aboriginals.

Wake the fuck up you tool.[/QUOTE]
Bizarre, Kev. Nothing to do with anything that anybody is talking about. Including you seemingly.

163

[QUOTE=“TheUlteriorMotive, post: 1068426, member: 2272”]The Indo :smiley: use the attack to attack SF

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/events-in-paris-show-adams-editor-at-gunpoint-remark-no-joke-cahill-30889851.html[/QUOTE]

That is just fucking priceless.

164

@Tassotti knows the score. Killing journalists is an afront to freedom everywhere

165

fuck them. The shower of cunts

166

your sticking up for people who killed over a pic

167

[QUOTE=“Fagan ODowd, post: 1068486, member: 706”]Now Kevin you did say that they were pretty stupid for publishing cartoons and that having published cartoons an attack “was bound to happen”. I would suggest that in a reasonable society that kind of reaction is an overreaction.
Would an attack on Channel 4 have been bound to happen because the fundamentalist Catholics of Ireland were outraged by Father Ted?[/QUOTE]
They knew who they were aggravating. They had already been attacked. It was stupid. The people who did it are completely stupid, mindless, viscous, evil and ridiculously touchy.
However we all know that, hence the stupidity.

168

Touchy is kind of an understatement.

169

Yes is was. People were bleeting about free speech.
I was pointing our free speech is ignored regularly and by white westerners as much as anyone.

170

When you listen to the audio on that youtube clip you can quite clearly hear the cop shouting at the terrorists to stop being so touchy about everything. That’s the nub of the problem right there.

171

I agree.

However this is probably the best example yet of people not reading what I am saying, making presumptions and not looking at my posts logically or fairly.
It’s alright though, cos I enjoy seemingly smart people make themselves look dumb sometimes.

172

Reckon Germany will be high alert now especially after the anti immigration protests that have been going on there.

Fucking towel cunts, I hope they rot in vat of pork.

173

Ohhhhhhhh, very very sarcastic. Not funny, but sarcastic none the less.
A bit like the cartoons I suppose.

174

[QUOTE=“caoimhaoin, post: 1068505, member: 273”]They knew who they were aggravating. They had already been attacked. It was stupid. The people who did it are completely stupid, mindless, viscous, evil and ridiculously touchy.
However we all know that, hence the stupidity.[/QUOTE]
I think any statement that equates the “stupidity” of the magazine journalists with “stupidity” of the terrorists is just unbelievably ill-advised and wrong-headed. It may not be your direct intention but you’ve used five adjectives to describe the terrorists - two of which are “stupid” and “touchy” and you’ve used one of those to describe those who were killed. Describing the attacks as inevitable, bound to happen, having decreased sympathy because of who the victims were, equating their stupidity to that of the terrorists (again, however ill-constructed your point was) is just preposterous.

There is nothing inevitable or justifiable or mitigating about killing those people. You appear to have absolutely no concept of satire - its intentions or what might reasonably be expected to be a reaction to satire.

175

Kevin and Muslims share a similar sense of humour.

176

[QUOTE=“Rocko, post: 1068520, member: 1”]I think any statement that equates the “stupidity” of the magazine journalists with “stupidity” of the terrorists is just unbelievably ill-advised and wrong-headed. It may not be your direct intention but you’ve used five adjectives to describe the terrorists - two of which are “stupid” and “touchy” and you’ve used one of those to describe those who were killed. Describing the attacks as inevitable, bound to happen, having decreased sympathy because of who the victims were, equating their stupidity to that of the terrorists (again, however ill-constructed your point was) is just preposterous.

There is nothing inevitable or justifiable or mitigating about killing those people. You appear to have absolutely no concept of satire - its intentions or what might reasonably be expected to be a reaction to satire.[/QUOTE]
Absolute bollix.
Not knowing your enemy or it’s capabilities or maybe then doing so and still antagonizing them is stupid.

Stupidity shouldn’t lead to such violence generally, but I think everyone knows at this stage, it can.

You have completely missed what I was saying, and I ain’t going back over it.

177

Please tag me in the relevant posts if you ever start doing that on TFK, mate.

178

[QUOTE=“caoimhaoin, post: 1068528, member: 273”]Absolute bollix.
Not knowing your enemy or it’s capabilities or maybe then doing so and still antagonizing them is stupid.

Stupidity shouldn’t lead to such violence generally, but I think everyone knows at this stage, it can.

You have completely missed what I was saying, and I ain’t going back over it.[/QUOTE]
They were a magazine. They didn’t have “enemies.”

179

[QUOTE=“caoimhaoin, post: 1068528, member: 273”]Absolute bollix.
Not knowing your enemy or it’s capabilities or maybe then doing so and still antagonizing them is stupid.

Stupidity shouldn’t lead to such violence generally, but I think everyone knows at this stage, it can.

You have completely missed what I was saying, and I ain’t going back over it.[/QUOTE]

So a satire magazine has enemies?

180

The same ideas about women as well. Keep em at home in the kitchen with the kids and they’d better shut the fuck up or else they’ll get a couple of digs.

181

It would appear that they do.