Whatever you need to do man
“inevitable and devastating rejoinder?”
He’s a Rosa Parks.
1 Like
Can we be clear, if only because I dislike tedium? Do you not want to answer that key question? If not, why not? You are clearly much invested in this area.
The rejoinder, by the way, is analytical in content. Nothing in the slightest personal to you or anyone else.
I do not accept the analogy. But it is an interesting one.
Even so, the analogy in no way answers my calm and rational and politely couched question.
Are you going to attempt an answer? Namely, is EB entitled to do whatever he wants on the basis of ‘conscience’?
He’s done his time with with every brain dead uninformed gobshite laughing at him.
In the longer form of history he’ll be proved right.
And is back doing more.
Do you want me to tell you the rejoinder?
All extemes are bad. We have gone very american with polarisation. One side blames the other and vise versa pushimg each other further and further apart. You make express concern at a topic now and youll be labelled far this and that tather than having an adult conversation with someone of an opposing view.
Its okay to disagree with something, but that was bonkers.
2 Likes
No. You’re way isn’t the highway.
People’s opinions differ. I respect yours. You don’t respect mine.
I don’t really care though.
Totally agree.
I give you the true voice of the Irish working class - Villers school educated, Provence resident Aisling O’Loughlin.
If your posts were a type of food they’d be a sausage roll, except the sausage would be replaced with a giant turd. Something designed to look bland and inoffensive on the outside, but bite any little bit at all into it, and the flaky exterior immediately gives way to a mound of stinking shit.
Obviously you’ll respond with a few stock empty clichés which I imagine you reciting with glazed hypnotised eyes.
You claim, on the basis of assertions here, to be deeply preoccupied by highly important social and legal issues. I respect that preoccupation.
What I do not respect is your unwillingness to answer a key question – especially when posed in calm and rational and polite terms.
The rejoinder in bonsai is as follows: ‘Trans people, and their advocates, can adduce ‘conscience’ – in the sense of emotionally/mentally/psychologically derived convictions – as their prompt to conduct every bit as much as EB. His own justification inflates the exact same balloon for his perceived opponents.’
I could give you a layman’s understanding of how this crux evolved since The Reformation due to Catholic-Protestant tensions. But there are legal experts here and I am far from an expert on Jurisprudence. I just happen to possess a calm and rational and curious mind.
Says the lad!!!
1 Like
Pal we all know youre the extreme and to avoid conversations in certain topics. You add nothing but shouting down anyone who disagrees. An absolute trope calling people a nazi while displaying similar behaviour
I see the klaxon sounded early this morning
If the klaxon was you responding to my post. I wouldn’t be a layabout going to protests for the day lad I was up and at it early
I realise that MHR is the smartest man in Kerry.
3 Likes
What issue have those head bangers got with MHR? It wouldn’t have been acceptable to accost anyone in that abusive manner but a government minister or back bencher you could possibly understand. A rural independent TD who never spares the government is another thing, though.
1 Like
Sorry but thats incoherent babble. Still feeling the effects of last nights bottle?
The klaxon was that you were posting at 6.30am but a fellow corkie was up and ready to like your post.
There are Ukranians living in property he owns