Who told you that? Where did you read it?
You buy the magic bullet theory?
Don’t be such a sheep. How do you reckon that happened? Or is it just because they told you that’s what happened?
I’m all for a properly grounded conspiracy theory but I remember seeing something about that which showed pretty conclusively that it was Oswald’s bullet.
[quote=“Mark Renton, post: 866318, member: 1796”]The same place they did, pal. Vanished.
What about the other witnesses who swore of other bullets that ricocheted before Kennedy was hit. Then there’s the wounds to Connolly and of course that last shot that blew his head apart that came from his right, not behind him.[/quote]
So what did these “vanished” bullets do? Did they miss Kennedy and Connally and shoot off into space? Or did they hit Kennedy and/or Connally? If the latter, why does all physical and video evidence suggest otherwise?
Oswald’s first shot missed the motorcade. It likely hit a branch of a tree and fragmented, part of which nicked the cheek of bystander James Tague who was standing near the underpass further down Elm Street, almost directly in line with Oswald with the direction Oswald was shooting in.
Kennedy was struck by two bullets. The one that hit him in the back of the neck, passed through him and passed through Connally into Connally’s thigh, and the fatal head shot. Both have been conclusively proven to have come from where Oswald was. There isn’t a doubt about this.
I pieced it together, mainly from sugar packets.
[quote=“Sidney, post: 866332, member: 183”]So what did these “vanished” bullets do? Did they miss Kennedy and Connally and shoot off into space? Or did they hit Kennedy and/or Connally? If the latter, why does all physical and video evidence suggest otherwise?
Oswald’s first shot missed the motorcade. It likely hit a branch of a tree and fragmented, part of which nicked the cheek of bystander James Tague who was standing near the underpass further down Elm Street, almost directly in line with Oswald with the direction Oswald was shooting in.
Kennedy was struck by two bullets. The one that hit him in the back of the neck, passed through him and passed through Connally into Connally’s thigh, and the fatal head shot. Both have been conclusively proven to have come from where Oswald was. There isn’t a doubt about this.[/quote]
We will revisit this in the morning.
Good night all.
[quote=“Mark Renton, post: 866338, member: 1796”]We will revisit this in the morning.
Good night all.[/quote]
Thinly veiled “I’m logging out because I fear an absolute clamping.”.
Not at all mate, I’m wrecked. Staying up until 5.30am to watch my beloved Patriots shit all over the Broncos caught up with me today.
This chap has dedicated years discussing the subject- And dismisses a lot of the official evidence.
http://www.und.edu/org/jfkconference/UNDchapter30.pdf
here is a dodgy interview of Clint Hill testifying that Jackie went onto the back of the car to scoop up a part of John’s brain - It was shot backwards- A number of medics stated that there was an entry wound at the front of Kennedys head and a large exit wound at the back. There was also an exit wound in his back, below the collar, indicating he was shot from the front… Clint Hill is a fucking rat.
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfrHqqzC3Sw
Here’s a nice short clip dimissing the umbrella man theory, a wonderful piece for all pseudo historians-
http://www.nytimes.com/video/opinion/100000001154288/focus.html
What ever about witnesses and theories and all the rest- The motion of Kennedy as he is hit with that last fatal blow if you freeze it, his head explodes from the front and the chunks of brain are blown backwards and also the magic bullet theory- These two just don’t add up. There was another shooter that day.
[quote=“Mark Renton, post: 866397, member: 1796”]This chap has dedicated years discussing the subject- And dismisses a lot of the official evidence.
http://www.und.edu/org/jfkconference/UNDchapter30.pdf
here is a dodgy interview of Clint Hill testifying that Jackie went onto the back of the car to scoop up a part of John’s brain - It was shot backwards- A number of medics stated that there was an entry wound at the front of Kennedys head and a large exit wound at the back. There was also an exit wound in his back, below the collar, indicating he was shot from the front… Clint Hill is a fucking rat.
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfrHqqzC3Sw
Here’s a nice short clip dimissing the umbrella man theory, a wonderful piece for all pseudo historians-
http://www.nytimes.com/video/opinion/100000001154288/focus.html
[/QUOTE]
The first guy you quoted there, who you couldn’t even name, James Fetzer, is a notorious conspiracy theorist. He believes September 11th was carried out by the military-industrial complex and Israel.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_H._Fetzer#9.2F11_attacks_on_WTC
Alleging treason[/URL] and oath violations, he called for military [URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coup_d%27etat’]overthrow[/URL] of the [URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_administration’]Bush administration[/URL],[URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_H._Fetzer#cite_note-Professors_of_paranoia.3F-36’][36][/URL] a position that hurt his mainstream credibility,[URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_H._Fetzer#cite_note-Atkins-bio-4’][4][/URL] as did his apparent fixation on Jews in [URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_government’]United States government[/URL].[URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_H._Fetzer#cite_note-Byford-11’][11][/URL] Atop backing allegations that the [URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7/7_London_bombings’]7/7 London bombings[/URL] in 2005, the [URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Hook_school_shooting’]Sandy Hook school shooting[/URL] in 2012, and the [URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Marathon_bombing’]Boston Marathon bombing[/URL] in 2013 were acts of governments’ [URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag’]covert[/URL] terrorism,[URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_H._Fetzer#cite_note-37’][37][/URL][URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_H._Fetzer#cite_note-38’][38][/URL] he initially suggested for [URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Hook_conspiracy_theory#Israeli_involvement_and_Iranian_propaganda’]Sandy Hook[/URL] a role by Israel’s [URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mossad’]Mossad[/URL] or in any case, via claimed inconsistencies, a governmental stratagem, perhaps to frighten Americans into further [URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_control’]gun restrictions[/URL].[URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_H._Fetzer#cite_note-39’][39][/URL] He later claimed that the Sandy Hook massacre was a sham.[URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_H._Fetzer#cite_note-40’][40][/URL] Fetzer has claimed evidence that [URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_landing_conspiracy_theories’]all six lunar landings were faked[/URL].[URL=‘http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_H._Fetzer#cite_note-SpirittoSpirit-41’][41]
He’s also a Holocaust denier. http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.ie/2013/06/jim-fetzers-reasons-to-believe-in.html
You really have looked at Oliver Stone’s movie and thought it was a documentary, haven’t you?
[quote=“Sidney, post: 866410, member: 183”]The first guy you quoted there, who you couldn’t even name, James Fetzer, is a notorious conspiracy theorist. He believes September 11th was carried out by the military-industrial complex and Israel.
He’s also a Holocaust denier. http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.ie/2013/06/jim-fetzers-reasons-to-believe-in.html
You really have looked at Oliver Stone’s movie and thought it was a documentary, haven’t you?[/quote]
Who said I couldn’t name him? And no, I haven’t, the fact that you are getting personal here tells me all I need to know… I can dismiss everything else but the wounds don’t add up…
You also said last night that there were four shots and he missed with the first, yeah? Or two shots did the damage and he missed with the first? So each subsequent shot gets better even tho he has less and less time and under more pressure? And with that weapon on a moving target?
Clint Hill himself, in that wonderful performance, said the head was blown backwards…
I have never really followed up the Ruby part, what was the deal there?
[quote=“Mark Renton, post: 866414, member: 1796”].
I have never really followed up the Ruby part, what was the deal there?[/quote]
have researched this extensively over the last 24 hours and it all points to CIA mind control techniques
Over you? Ruby? the general public?
[quote=“Mark Renton, post: 866414, member: 1796”]Who said I couldn’t name him? And no, I haven’t, the fact that you are getting personal here tells me all I need to know… I can dismiss everything else but the wounds don’t add up…
You also said last night that there were four shots and he missed with the first, yeah? [/quote]
Eh, no I didn’t.
You said there were six shots and three gunmen, right?
Is Sidney part of the Industrial-Military Complex?
[quote=“Sidney, post: 866426, member: 183”]Eh, no I didn’t.
You said there were six shots and three gunmen, right?[/quote]
Ok, you made me scroll back and read it. You reckon he missed with the first, the one he had the most time with, yet his best shot was his last, after having to reload twice… I’m not an expert like yourself, I just don’t think it adds up mate. Can you be bothered laying it all out for me there?
I didn’t type that earlier post or at least I don’t recall doing so.
What post?
He missed with the first. probably because his view become partly obscured by a tree crossing his sightline. It’s probable that that bullet fragmented off a branch and a fragment of it ended up nicking James Tague.
He had an unobscured shot with the second and third shots and I’ve already showed that he was more than capable of making those shots successfully.