The Celebrity Spotting Thread Part Twee (or help Flatty identify the celeb he just spotted) (Part 1)

Iā€™m a democrat, mate

Your sickening shows of dissent are appalling.

Iā€™m not one of your minnions buddy,this smark lad has to go then we can be e-friends again

Thereā€™s rules here. The new (democratically elected) adjudicator gets a term of six months within which no new challenges can be mounted. Former adjudicators can only run again after ten years on the sidelines. If they so wish to go for another term after ten years, fine, they can throw their name in. We donā€™t just go making the rules up here on the fly mate and putting up new polls when a few blowhard layabouts demand it.

3 Likes

This has the potential to split the forum in two.

:clap:

Glad this is catching on

2-15ā€¦this is April 2016:joy:

There was a vote, and I won it handsomely you skidmark. Despite all your PMs to all the other league members begging them to vote me out. Good to see it still hurts.

@Smark what are you afraid of? Lets have a vote and may the best man win.

skidmark :laughing:

1 Like

You never won it, all members didnā€™t vote. Obviously it still rankles that some freak who tried to hide his change of username and threw games in case he had to leave a fantasy league is still in the segunda. Youā€™re of questionable character, not someone worthy of the segunda.

1 Like

And if they dont like the result of the next vote, sure lets just have another, and another. Fianna fail esque

1 Like

we need a ā€˜faces youā€™d love to smarkā€™ thread too.

I had already attained an unassailable majority you stupid, stupid cunt. :slight_smile:

1 Like

No you didnā€™t, several of your votes were from posters who never played in the segunda and subsequently voted for its destruction. They were ruled invalid on appeal.

Are you a slow learner?

Because we already had that vote and I won. Imagine Michael D Higgins having to come out every second day and explain to a few dim wits that there had been a democratic process and the majority voted him in. You couldnā€™t make it up. Michael D gets seven years where no-one can challenge him. Be glad I only have six months before ye can put up a candidate. Ye should be using this time to build a credible campaign around the new man, whoever that should be. And please make it a good candidate as Iā€™m very busy and donā€™t know how I will manage another term, but if the people vote me in a second time then by god I will give it my all again.

5 Likes

To answer your first question, yes he is. And a weirdo, just look at the segunda episode.

As for the rest, nail on head, keep up the good work.

Youā€™re at the very top of your adjudication game, mate. Youā€™re brimming with confidence.

you can be assured of one thing, I will vote for you, the best adjudicator I have ever seen in over seventeen and half years on the INTERNET

4 Likes

It was an open, public vote on the thread you utter fool. :joy: You are outdoing yourself now. Iā€™m bidding you farewell, I wonā€™t be replying to your arrant stupidity for the rest of the night, a complete waste of time.

1 Like

I may not agree with some of the decisions @Smark makes but he was elected fair and square. It sickens me to see the likes of the screaming maryā€™s likes @Matty_Hislop and @Massey think they can just dictate how this noble thread should be run. Where were they when the original poll was on? Assholes.