The Celebrity Spotting Thread Part Twee (or help Flatty identify the celeb he just spotted) (Part 1)

[HBV]

You have groomed @Brimmer_Bradley for this, which is quite disgraceful considering he is a certified simpleton.

[anon61956325]

[Big_Dan_Campbell]

I think it is fair to say whatever happens Brimmer won’t be the next adjudicator. The only reason someone would vote for him would be as some kind of sick perverted joke.

There are only three posters on here with the gravitas for the role - @thedancingbaby, @Fagan_ODowd and @Smark

[Rocko]

@Big_Dan_Campbell

I think it is fair to say whatever happens Brimmer won’t be the next adjudicator. The only reason someone would vote for him would be as some kind of sick perverted joke.

There are only three posters on here with the gravitas for the role - @thedancingbaby, @Fagan_ODowd and @Smark

I’m nominating @RaymondCrotty.

[Parochial_House]

@Rocko

@Big_Dan_Campbell

I think it is fair to say whatever happens Brimmer won’t be the next adjudicator. The only reason someone would vote for him would be as some kind of sick perverted joke.

There are only three posters on here with the gravitas for the role - @thedancingbaby, @Fagan_ODowd and @Smark

I’m nominating @RaymondCrotty.

Seconded.

[Big_Dan_Campbell]

He doesn’t post regularly enough. Both him and @Rintintin would both make solid adjudicators but they don’t post enough. I also don’t think the electorate will go for Larry after he was involved in that clergy voting scandal the last time he ran

[Rocko]

@Big_Dan_Campbell

He doesn’t post regularly enough. Both him and @Rintintin would both make solid adjudicators but they don’t post enough. I also don’t think the electorate will go for Larry after he was involved in that clergy voting scandal the last time he ran

There’s an objectivity that comes with distance though. We’d need assurances about regular logging-in but we don’t actually require a high post count to deliver on the role.

[Bandage]

Note to @Locke. This is how you generate interest in a thread - please heed some lessons for IOTM. Hundreds of posts since the admin team temporarily suspended @Brimmer_Bradley 's user privileges. I was wary when @Rocko first proposed it but it’s really captured the imagination of the forum with claim, counter claim, proposal, counter proposal and rows about polls. Everything great about TFK.

[Fagan_ODowd]

@Big_Dan_Campbell

I think it is fair to say whatever happens Brimmer won’t be the next adjudicator. The only reason someone would vote for him would be as some kind of sick perverted joke.

There are only three posters on here with the gravitas for the role - @thedancingbaby, @Fagan_ODowd and @Smark

I’d like to rise above the fray here Big Mick, if you don’t mind. I’ve shirked the responsility of taking on this role a number of times and I’d prefer to keep it that way.

[Big_Dan_Campbell]

The role is a figurehead role and one of the most prestigious in all the internet. He has to be a man of the people and forum. He would have to post more. Aside from the clergy scandal, didn’t Larry walk away from the forum due to getting a red rover prediction wrong.

He simply doesn’t have the credibility

[Big_Dan_Campbell]

Fair enough, auld stock. For what its worth you would do a fine job of it, but it is a huge responsibility

[flattythehurdler]

Not much point when a listers are turned down and hairless monobrowed mouthbreathing redneck obscurities outside the limerick borders get the nod.

[Rintintin]

Thanks pal I needed that pick me up as I’ve had a long arduous Monday.

[flattythehurdler]

You’ll do what you’re fucking well told for once.

[flattythehurdler]

Please?

[carryharry]

Whinge Whinge.

[balbec]

Maybe we should appoint you altogether.

[flattythehurdler]

Ah there you are balbec. How was NYC?

[balbec]

Going this Thursday.

[flattythehurdler]

Shave the beard.