Where have I praised radical Islam, you nutcase.
Look back a few posts. You’re struggling badly here if you’re forgetting what was posted only a few minutes ago.
Try reading the entire post where I responded to @Julio_Geordio, instead of your usual quote mining bullshit that a 12 year old could see through.
You called Saudi Arabia a benevolent monarchy.
Saudi Arabia is an authoritarian Wahhabist state - Wahhabism is indivisible and fundamental to what it is.
There are credible accusations that Saudi Arabia may have funded ISIS, Saudi Arabians were responsible for September 11th, and Saudi Arabia has been waging a bloody genocidal war against the Houthis in Yemen.
You call them benevolent because they’re Trump’s buddies.
You literally just posted above that it was institutional colonialism and mysoginy by Britain.
You’ve also stated it was racism.
I provided you a link and names of people who Britain had previously revoked citizenship from. That included a white male of Australian extraction who wanted to go back to the U.K after a terrorist dalliance. You ignore that because it doesn’t suit a narrative.
On an individual level you go on about racists and frothing right wingers. It is entirely possible that people are absolutely against people coming back because they do not want their children blown to pieces when going to a pop concert. That’s a little nuance on people’s behaviour and opinions that you lack because you are determined to put someone on a “team”.
Glas is being disingenuous here but is more intelligent than you so he can lower the volume on these things down a bit.
1 Like
You’ve provided precisely zero rebuttal to any of my points there.
Thanks for that.
1 Like
I can post it all again but you will just ignore it, like you did before.
1 Like
I ignored it because it’s self-evidently a steaming pile of irrelevant crap.
I was discussing Venezuela and the plight of the citizens of that country, 20% of whom have fled and the majority now living in abject poverty (not poverty as it’s defined in Ireland). Julio brought up Saudi Arabia (so relevant) and the plight of it’s citizens. There is nothing praiseworthy about being called a “somewhat benevolent medieval monarchy”, which is exactly how they behave towards their own citizenry. I know you love the concept of welfare, this is the Saudi version.
https://www.seattletimes.com/business/half-the-saudi-population-receiving-welfare-in-new-system/
I abhor and condemn all authoritarian and totalitarian governments, Islamic nations in particular, unlike your dear leader who was a great friend of the USSR and now a great friend of Maduro’s Venezuela.
This isis crowd are all in favour of keeping sex slaves. That’s all I need at my age.
Will you be on trying to argue tomorrow is Saturday next?
This is the level you are at.
Given that you’re demonstrably completely brainwashed by far right US media, one shouldn’t be surprised that your “arguments” have become so laughably ridiculous.
Sure Trump’s buddy Jeffrey Epstein was the same, with the difference that he kept underage ones.
He got away with a slap on the wrist though, thanks to Trump’s current Labour secretary.
The similiarities between far right US ideology and ISIS get creepier and creepier.
But that doesn’t mean you have to be such a wanker sid!!!
1 Like
I don’t watch or read any “far right” US media. As a hard left Marxist, everyone to the right of you is “far right”. You belong to the nutcase camp that call Guaido far right, even though his Popular Will party are center left and members of Socialist International.
“forgive my handwriting” 
http://www.chortle.co.uk/news/2019/01/26/42154/bbc_made_russell_howard_rewrite_a_joke_–_in_case_it_offended_isis
You literally post conspiracy theories and fake stories straight from right-wing disinformation sites and shows. 
Bill Clinton’s mate Sid. Bill rode on the Lolita express 26 times, and got generous donations from Epstein. It’s odd how the sexual escapades of liberals don’t seem to concern you.
Is Fox News “far right” now? I rarely watch it, but it seems to me to be a conservative outlet. Do you think the Republicans shouldn’t be allowed any coverage of their views, as you certainly won’t hear them on Vox or CNN for that matter. It’s a strange viewpoint from someone who supposedly values liberal democracy. Soviet like literally.
“Hey, but the Clintons”
You literally can’t even bring yourself to condemn paedophilia by Trump’s mate now, and the illegal and disgusting ultra-lenient plea bargain offered to the paedophile at the centre of it by Trump’s Labour secretary. 
And there’s lots of legitimate questions to be asked about Trump’s own involvement, as well as that of Alan Dershowitz.
Especially given that an actual court case was filed by a 13 year old girl who said Trump raped her.
Would certianly explain why Dershowitz is such a shill for Trump.
Fox News is an active far right disinformation network, which is why you lap it up.
I’d trust RT before I’d trust Fox, and that’s saying something.
You’re the archetypal Fox viewer - bigoted, racist, hypocritical, deluded, a liar.