The Rapist Conor McGregor Club Sponsored By Fossett's 🐐

Man who makes a video is looking for views?
Mind blowing

1 Like

You understand how YouTube works, right?

2 Likes

Fuck him

The quotations should give a clue to the discerning eye. The content is in favour of Mrs Hand… but :man_shrugging:

https://twitter.com/IronMikey85/status/1861139314546979248

I didn’t understand a word of it but it sounded bad so I kept the head down.

2 Likes

Why is he hiding in his garage? Is the knock on the door at 7.34 significant?

1 Like

Avoiding canvassers maybe :man_shrugging:t2:

2 Likes

Cos there’s a lad upstairs in his bedroom recording united tiktoks in the dark.

5 Likes

He disgraced himself on the Kyle hayes case.

Deliberately put a prerogative caption on his videos here to get more clicks.

A weird thing to be trying to be profiting off as well.

He can get in the bin or stay in the attic

The second captains podcast is excellent on the case.

Also outlined the differences between criminal and civil cases.

Terry has a lovely way about him.

I reckon he’s a trump supporter anyway

You know I love you bro but you badly need to be more subtle in your trolling.

https://twitter.com/tomlyonsbiz/status/1861354066355294642?s=46

1 Like

Sorry about my ignorance guys :flushed:

Why was it a civil and not a criminal case?

I presume all the fellas who were shouting furiously about the evils of cancel culture will be up in arms at this?

McGregor being made a pariah by civil society is the very definition of cancel culture.

The McGregor cancellation is entirely representative of what the anti-cancel culture zealots object to.

It’s also an entirely appropriate and justified response by civil society.

But if the anti-cancel culture zealots don’t defend McGregor here, it’s a prima facie demonstration by them that they were bullshitters all along.

Proper Twelve is on special in Tescos. 25€ down from 40 ish (you’d wonder what sort of a mug would pay 40€ for a bottle of young Bushmills pish). I reckon Tescos are clearing their stock before announcing their own boycott

4 Likes

The DPP decided not to pursue a criminal case against him presumably because they didn’t think they had strong enough evidence to get a conviction. The victim took a private civil case against him for assault. The level of proof needed in a civil case is lower. I stand to be corrected by @artfoley

3 Likes

The DPP declined to prosecute.