He is and he isn’t.
His party is brand new. It is a rejection of the old order.
He is and he isn’t.
His party is brand new. It is a rejection of the old order.
Still not figuring things out.
It takes all sorts, though.
He doesn’t reject the old order when it comes to his old lady…
A UKIP candidate in Glasgow thinks being gay is the same as being sexually attracted to gorillas, and wants to introduce the guillotine.
And she’s one of their better candidates across the UK.
[quote]Ukip candidate Gisela Allen compares her attraction to gorillas to being gay
‘Do you think I am going all over the city and saying my idea of a sexually-attractive creature is a gorilla?’ says candidate for Glasgow council[/quote]
Your definition of what LePen “is all about”.
You really are a fool.
That’s true, I’m not saying he is a total outsider here but he isn’t a fully fledged part either.
He did abandon the Socialist Party and created a whole new movement.
We have neither of the two traditional movements/PPs in the run off. We have the far right and far left candidates getting over 50% of the young voting between them. It’s a rejection of the establishment in anyone’s language.
Macron is “far left”?
Of course that isn’t all she is about but to the Mail that is all she is. They don’t give a fuck about internal French economic policies. They like someone who is going to weaken the European project and is anti immigration though.
Melenchon.
No. Mélenchon is.
John Cougar Melanchon
About as much as I am. “Socialist” economy minister until last August FFS.
Russia is a far-right state these days, mate.
Ah, I was wondering where you were getting 50% from, but forgot about the other candidates outside the top 5.
It’s not “all about” the top two.
The Fake News Tories have been caught out rotten spreading fake, photoshopped propaganda against Jeremy Corbyn.
A supposed photo of a woman giving him a two fingers sign on a doorstep was in fact Labour supporter Catherine Finney giving him a clenched fist gesture of support.
That’s unreal.
Dear Sirs,
I found it difficult to disagree with any of Gisela Allen’s election manifesto which you published recently. However could I suggest a few small tweaks which I think would really push the proposals over the top;
I’m intrigued by Gisela’s plan to give children a chance to work with and ride horses. I think it could tie in brilliantly with her plan of separate class rooms for each class, and a caste system to keep the children from moving between classes. Can I suggest to save costs the working class children could be taught in the stables. Days of shovelling horse manure and doing the hard work around the stables, while the more privileged children enjoy all the benefits of their labour, should prepare them well for future life.
I also agree wholeheartedly with Gisela’s plan to reverse the long term trend towards people living longer by forcing them to do an extra 5 years work before retirement (and to knock another few years off those who survive by making them walk everywhere). Can I suggest an extension of Margaret MacDonald’s assisted dying law, to those reliant on financial assistance to live as well those reliant on medical assistance.
I too believe we need to remove sexual education from the classrooms, as indeed I too believe we are heading towards WWIII. If we continue our efforts to reduce our lower classes birth rate, who will we send to the front lines of the war? Unfortunately I fear we cannot outsource those jobs to India & China.
The abolition of the LGBT community should allow for seamless reopening of public toilets, while the converting of all Golf Courses into community gardens will give the stay at home mothers somewhere to pass their time.
Finally I think the re-enactments of hanging and guillotine executions could be a great tourist draw, perhaps it could be tied in with the euthanasia of the elderly?
Yours etc,
Ronnie goes for the red first