You left out the words “…which has adopted the IHRA definition.”
Selectively quoting part of a sentence in order to deliberately leave out the context is dishonest quoting.
The Tories never even adopted the IHRA definition.
Again, here’s what you said.
At 12:02. Lansmann responds to Guru-Murthy’s statement that “you’ve admitted yourself that you’ve more problems with anti-semitism than any other mainstream party in Britain”.
“I have not said that, I haven’t said we’ve got more problems.”
He goes on to say:
“The evidence actually shows that members and supporters of other parties there are proportionately greater… there are more instances of anti-semitism”.
That categorically proves you wrong.
And so does the evidence, which does indeed show that Labour supporters are less likely to be anti-semitic, than Tory supporters, who were found to be even more likely to be anti-semitic than UKIP supporters!
Now, this whole story has been relentlessly pushed by the Tory press ever since Corbyn became Labour leader, and again, we can all guess why that is. No reference to anti-semitism as a societal problem, only reference to it as a Labour problem. It’s the same with yourself.
You don’t see anti-semitism as a societal problem, as you’ve proved since Trump’s election. You only see it as an opportunity to try and vilify Corbyn and Labour.
The Tories made no reference to anti-semitism whatsoever in their party code of conduct until one week ago, after Channel 4 had embarrassed them by revealing such.
Under Corbyn, Labour have dramatically ramped up intolerance of anti-semitism.
So it’s actually Labour who are taking anti-semitism more seriously than the Tories.
Which party has the problem again?