Noel Dorr forelock tugging to a ridiculous degree here.
This Frenchie panellist is a ringer for Jack Dee
Niamh looking quite slovenly tonight and getting very little airtime here from Vinny
Discussion about the Middle East goes just a bit over Niamhās head.
I would ya
Mick Wallace giving himself a lot of rope here. He should shut the fuck up.
Mick is simple
Decent argument put forward by Vincent - he could commit a serious crime and retain his seat but could lose it due to bankruptcy. Maybe he should have gone racing in Punchestown this evening, got blind drunk, and drove down the M7 in the wrong direction endangering many lives.
You lose your Dail seat if you are sent to prison for more than six months. McDaid of course didnāt serve one day.
Sarah looking eeven more gorgeous than usual tonight
I like the way Vinny doesnāt let people talk bollocks. Brian Lucey used the phrase reductio in absurdio and Vinny blackguarded him until he explained what that actually meant. Kenny by contrast would have pretended to know what it meant
im sure his suppliers and sub contractors that he owes money to console themselves with that whataboutery argument too.
Iād say this Laura one thinks sheās gorgeous judging by her body language. Sheās not.
Iād say Laura is quite a down to earth girl
sigh
Getting a business card from Bernard McNamara doesnāt make you an expert on an industry. Always bear that in mind.
Have you not got some football thread to embarrass yourself on again at this time of night?
sigh
you dont have to be an expert on industry or anything for that matter (category you fall under) to know that those who dont pay what they owe are ultimately responsible for the debts. Wallace has obviously made some disastrous business decisions and like many others is responsible for that, not Jim McDaid or the evil banks. A lot more will be stung as a result of him going under - suppliers, subbies etc. Noone really mentions them when the likes of you put forward the poor Mick Wallace argument.
just pointing out the whataboutme nature of your idiotic arguments that you routinely put forward to support your betters - Yates, JP, Wallace - anyone else Iām missing there that you look up to? You had the exact same argument for Yates actually, what do administrators know about running a bookmakers kind of thing, glossing over that it was Yates himself and in this case Wallace who are pretty much wholly responsible for the collapse of their business.
Are you as this loyal to all Wexford TDās
Show me where I said that Wallace and / or Yates were not responsible for the collapse of their businesses and come back to me.
Where is Aine Kerr? 
Itās Friday afternoon so Iām not going to be bothered digging out exact quotes but since you agree with me anyway Iāll accept your backtrack with the dignity in which it was given.
Wallace, Yates etc might well be alright sorts but the collapses of their businesses will affect an awful lot of people (unsecured creditors) like the subbies and suppliers who did little wrong. A lot of these unsecured creditors have gone bust, I know some myself, Iām sure ye all do, waiting for the cheque to come. I donāt think the plight of these little people in the Nama bubble is highlighted enough at the moment. Might not be the case for Wallace but NAMA seems to be protecting the falls of many that donāt deserve it.
Agree with you? Donāt make me laugh man!
If youāre going to bother making sweeping accusations at least have the facts to back it up ye clown.