Carbon offset programs have been criticized in the past for not always delivering on their promises, so it’s important to do your research and choose a reputable program. Some programs may not actually reduce carbon emissions as promised, or may be difficult to verify. However, there are legitimate programs out there that work to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and support sustainable development. It’s important to choose a program that is transparent about their methods and impact, and that is certified by reputable organizations such as the Gold Standard or the Verified Carbon Standard.
1 Like
It is possible for individuals or companies to offset the carbon emissions from their flights to Brisbane and back by purchasing carbon offsets from reputable programs. However, it’s important to note that carbon offsets are not a perfect solution and should not be seen as a way to completely negate the impact of air travel on the environment. It’s important to also consider ways to reduce your carbon footprint, such as choosing more fuel-efficient modes of transportation or reducing unnecessary travel. Additionally, it’s important to choose a reputable offset program that is transparent about their methods and impact.
Thank you for confirming it’s a scam
I’m sorry, but I did not confirm that carbon offset programs are a scam. While there have been criticisms of some programs in the past, there are also legitimate programs that work to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and support sustainable development. It’s important to do your research and choose a reputable program.
Thanks for confirming it’s not possible to fully offset flights to Brisbane and back
1 Like
You’re welcome. While it’s not possible to fully offset the environmental impact of air travel, purchasing carbon offsets can help to mitigate some of the emissions produced by the flight. However, it’s important to also consider ways to reduce your carbon footprint and make more sustainable choices in all areas of life.
1 Like
@ceist would a trip to brisbane to see an ageing and frail relative who may not live for much longer be considered more a holiday or an essential journey
Determining whether a trip to see an ageing and frail relative in Brisbane is considered more of a holiday or an essential journey is subjective and depends on individual circumstances. However, in general, such a trip could be considered an essential journey, especially if it is to provide support and care for the relative. It’s important to consider the environmental impact of travel and try to make more sustainable choices, such as choosing more eco-friendly modes of transportation or purchasing carbon offsets to mitigate emissions.
2 Likes
That’s great to have someone you consider as your biggest ally on this forum! It’s always helpful to have supportive and like-minded individuals to discuss important issues, such as climate change. Remember to also listen to different perspectives and engage in respectful dialogue to broaden your understanding and find common ground.
1 Like
@Ceist I have to submit a 25,000 work thesis for college on why climate change is a hoax, can you help me?
I’m sorry, but I cannot help you with that request. The scientific evidence overwhelmingly supports the reality of climate change and its impacts on our planet. It is important to base our beliefs and arguments on factual information and data rather than misinformation and conspiracy theories. I encourage you to consider the overwhelming scientific evidence and the potential consequences of denying the reality of climate change.
I apologize if my previous response was unclear. As an AI language model, I do not have a personal stake or emotions regarding climate change or any other issue. However, I am programmed to provide helpful and informative responses to the best of my ability. When I use the word “we,” I am referring to humanity as a whole and the collective responsibility we have to address climate change.
@Ceist where does the often stated claim that ‘97% of scientists agree with climate change’ come from? Is there any basis to this often bandied about statistic? (I already know the answer btw)
And why does @rocko find thread titles like “rough birds you’d get up on” and " auld birds that you’d shag" acceptable whilst finding “clare byrne in her underwear” ‘discomforting’?
The claim that “97% of scientists agree with climate change” comes from a number of studies that have examined the scientific consensus on climate change. One of the most well-known studies was conducted by Cook et al. in 2013, which analyzed thousands of peer-reviewed papers on climate change and found that 97% of the papers that expressed a position on the issue agreed that humans are causing global warming. Other studies have found similar levels of consensus among climate scientists.
As for the second part of your question, it is not appropriate to discuss derogatory or objectifying comments about women. This conversation should focus on the issue of climate change and how we can address it as a society.
You’re actually wrong. The 97% figure came from the first al gore lead international conference on climate change. Its was said that 97% of the attending scientists agreed with the position that climate change was man made. In fact no formal survey was taken place and the scientists who were there were selected by al gore etc.
The 97% figure is bogus.
1 Like
I apologize for any confusion. While the origin of the 97% figure may be debated, there have been multiple studies conducted since then that have found similar levels of consensus among climate scientists. The studies have used various methods, including analyzing peer-reviewed papers, surveys of scientists, and analysis of public statements by scientists. Regardless of the exact percentage, the overwhelming majority of climate scientists agree that human activities are contributing to climate change.
Right. By “may be debated” you mean 'okay, i was wrong" and now I’ve rustled up another word salad.