🤷‍♂️ What the fuck is wrong with people?

[MogwaiC86]

@Juhniallio

Charlie Kirk would approve of your moral stance.

Charlie Kirk wasn’t a prisoner. Charlie Kirk was a paedo-Nazi propagandist freely peddling his paedo-Nazi propaganda across the world.

[jellyfish]

@myboyblue

Because he’s a scumbag?

Of course, but has he nobody to tell him to at least look like you’ve made an effort when you’re standing there in front of the judge? Or maybe he knows himself but can’t be arsed. Who knows.

[neilld]

Some people are completely their authentic selves and find it difficult to take direction. It may also be a sensory issue that he needs such clothes. Hopefully Leinster get it done on Saturday anyway

[farmerinthecity]

In the overall sphere of things that shouldn’t be allowed happen in a society, ensuring convicted prisoners don’t get assaulted is pretty far down the list.

[Batigol]

If you treat prisoners brutally you’ll get nothing back out at the end of their sentence other than a more brutal criminal.

[backinatracksuit]

I’m sure everybody agrees with that but it’s quite pointless
What do you want from our prisons

[myboyblue]

@jellyfish

@myboyblue

Because he’s a scumbag?

Of course, but has he nobody to tell him to at least look like you’ve made an effort when you’re standing there in front of the judge? Or maybe he knows himself but can’t be arsed. Who knows.

I think you’re overestimating the mental machinations of a person like this. They have no moral compass, no decency, no respect. He doesnt give a fuck for a justice system, let alone those who operate within. He’s scum. The shit on your shoe. I couldnt think of much worse than being the prision officer assigned to minding a cunt like that when he is inside, let alone someone who has to try rehabilitate him.

[Mac]

@Batigol

If you treat prisoners brutally you’ll get nothing back out at the end of their sentence other than a more brutal criminal.

Would it be a loss to society if an evil cunt like that never made it out of prison? I don’t imagine he’ll ever be ‘rehabilitated’.

[Batigol]

No maybe not. I’d say the sentence is much too short too.

But locking up lads indefinitely is a bad road to start going down

[MogwaiC86]

@farmerinthecity

In the overall sphere of things that shouldn’t be allowed happen in a society, ensuring convicted prisoners don’t get assaulted is pretty far down the list.

It was strange that the sort of people I’d most expect to hold that opinion suddenly started treating prisoner welfare as an issue of the utmost seriousness when Barbie Kardashian was the person allegedly making threats.

[MogwaiC86]

@Mac

Would it be a loss to society if an evil cunt like that never made it out of prison? I don’t imagine he’ll ever be ‘rehabilitated’.

There are a lot of people who wouldn’t be much loss to society if they were murdered. Doesn’t necessarily mean they should be murdered though does it?

Should we go into psychiatric wards and start murdering people on the basis they’d be “no losss to society”? Should we start murdering the homeless, as in the actual homeless people sleeping rough?

What’s a “loss to society” anyway? Prisoners and rough sleepers and heroin addicts and even hardened criminals are still somebody’s son or daughter.

[MogwaiC86]

@myboyblue

I think you’re overestimating the mental machinations of a person like this. They have no moral compass, no decency, no respect. He doesnt give a fuck for a justice system, let alone those who operate within. He’s scum. The shit on your shoe. I couldnt think of much worse than being the prision officer assigned to minding a cunt like that when he is inside, let alone someone who has to try rehabilitate him.

Did Michael Collins have any of those things?

[Mac]

@MogwaiC86

@Mac

Would it be a loss to society if an evil cunt like that never made it out of prison? I don’t imagine he’ll ever be ‘rehabilitated’.

There are a lot of people who wouldn’t be much loss to society if they were murdered. Doesn’t necessarily mean they should be murdered though does it?

Should we go into psychiatric wards and start murdering people on the basis they’d be “no losss to society”? Should we start murdering the homeless, as in the actual homeless people sleeping rough?

What’s a “loss to society” anyway? Prisoners and rough sleepers and heroin addicts and even hardened criminals are still somebody’s son or daughter.

You’re taking a fair leap there. Many of those you’ve mentioned have ended up in those circumstance through no fault of their own. I’m talking about a guy who has displayed numerous evil tendencies and is unlikely to ever change based on the evidence that was presented in his court case.

[MogwaiC86]

Even if a prisoner displays “numerous evil tendencies and is unlikely to ever change”, should we be murdering them or facilitating their murder?

[Mac]

Did I say they should be murdered or we should facilitate their murder?

[MogwaiC86]

@Mac

Did I say they should be murdered or we should facilitate their murder?

Well the whole discussion is about killing or seriously maiming or seriously assaulting prisoners and several posters have expressed a wish that that happens.

I’m not really sure how to read the below other than that its expression of a wish for such.

@Mac

With a bit of luck he’ll get what he deserves on the inside

[Juhniallio]

You spent a week or more celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk

[MogwaiC86]

@Juhniallio

You spent a week or more celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk

Was Charlie Kirk a prisoner?

[farmerinthecity]

@MogwaiC86

What’s a “loss to society” anyway?

It is very clear.

Dangerous people.

People who have infringed on other’s human rights, some horrifically so.

People who would do the same again if they got the chance.

Not people in psyche wards, not homeless people, not heroin addicts.

[farmerinthecity]

Maybe, maybe not.

I am not advocating it. But I wouldn’t shed much tears if if it was to happen either.