[quote=“BenShermin”]I don’t understand what you’re getting at here. Of course there are homeless with drug problems, but I don’t see how Simon are fueling the problem by giving them food or shelter. They can’t spend a bowl of soup, a second hand book and a chat on drugs.
I don’t see why any vouchers/cash should be given out by charities in Ireland tbh. We have generous social welfare in this country that people can live off, after bills, mortgages and the like, little money is left for food, people don’t need vouchers, people need food hampers, actual toys etc. Giving vouchers/cash leaves the door open for fraud.
The single mother arguement I admit just slipped out, of course they are not all drug users, and of course there are other drug users. It was just an example more than anything else, in the future I will not use examples in any of my posts as to not offend anybody.[/quote]
Homeless persons Ben, or people suffering from homelessness. Not just homeless. 
Anyway the article was about cash, it was either wildly out of date, incorrect or invented I’d say. That’s what passes for “opinion journalism” these days.
Simon of course are not fuelling drug problems by giving food or shelter but if you think Smyths toys vouchers can facilitate drug use then you can bet that free food and accommodation is too. The real problems causing the drug abuse are outside of these sideshows anyway but it seems really bizarre to single out the Simon Community as benefactors for your donations if your goal is to keep them drug free. If you want to go to percentages you’ll find an awful lot more drug addicts among the people helped by the Simon Community than you would in the VdeP. But that doesn’t really suit your argument does it.
None of which I believe is particularly relevant anyway, I’m just addressing your points. If you’re going to give money to charity then do it. Adding strings like you don’t want single mothers or drug abusers getting it is nonsense. You’re penalising people for the symptoms of their problems, you’re not solving anything for anyone that way.
Finally a very high percentage of VdeP recipients this Christmas will be people in employment, can’t remember the exact figure. It’s not about social welfare, it’s about people finding themselves in circumstances that mean they can’t afford food, toys etc. If you think they don’t deserve help then fair enough but that’s a fairly narrow minded view of charity.