Agreed. But commercial tenancies normally involve paying a key money day 1 which entitled to you a lease for 20 years or whatever. With renewal rights. Never heard of it in Ireland for residential.
The leasehold you’re referring to is a different thing it’s down to historic property ownership and it would be a 999 year lease or something which is treated by all as same as a freehold for mortgage purposes
I am. What were they? It appears at the moment one of the issues in being a tenant is the lack of long term tenure. Commercial tenants who pay their rent don’t have this issue. Seems odd that a commercial tenant can gain more rights than an individual
It’s one of these law of unintended consequences but of legislation intended for the good of the tenant but ultimately means that tenant can never have a long term residency in a dwelling.
I had a conversation with a colleague last week on housing etc. Now they told me that when a new build estate is put on the market with 10% social/affordable housing, the remaining 90% of the houses in the estate pay for that social housing (everyone else pays and extra 10%) and not general taxation. They said they changed the law a few years back and this is the case. Is that true?
My understanding was the state bought the 10% of houses with general taxation money etc.
Would be good know what’s the story before I start talking out my hole
I’m fairly sure they’re wrong. The developer has to give 10% to the council. Possibly your friend means that the developer will usually pass that charge onto the other private buyers and your friend has confused themselves.
Can be up to 20%, every estate is included afaik, previously developers could make a financial contribution or offer alternatives off-site ( buy some houses in other areas and offer them to the Local Authorities). Most LAs insist on on-site now.