No more Nazi-ish (your definition, not mine) than banning any expressions of free speech. Most European countries have pretty strict laws on hate speech (unlike the US where free speech is constitutionally protected). Do you know how many people are in jails all over Europe for expressing âbanned viewsâ such as questioning certain aspects of the holocaust, blaming gays for the spread of AIDS, etc. Why is that acceptable but banning a poisonous religion isnât? A religion that openly calls for the eradication of all non Muslims mind you.
Again, yours its a completely inappropriate analogy, but one lunatic lefties trot out regularly. The Nazis were racist cunts, plain and simple, to them the Aryan race were human and all other races subhuman (similar to how the British treated the Irish in the 19th century). The Jews happened to be the largest minority, but no one regarded as subhuman was spared. There should be no tolerance in civilized societies for hate speech towards any individual or group based on their race, color, sexual preference, anything based on their biological make up. Religion has/should have nothing to do with biology, its a set of beliefs, an ideology. However, some religions are fairly benign while others are openly intolerant, a bit like politics. Why do we ban white supremacists? Because we have seen what happened when their ideology took hold of a population. Why do muslims get a free pass to spread their intolerance?
Thatâs the question the left have to answer as currently its completely hypocritical to ban some expressions of âhate speechâ, while allowing and protecting others. There is only one group today that can be realistically compared to the Nazis in terms of their intolerance of humans that are different to them, and thatâs radical Muslims, and it stems directly from their religious ideology.
Would you class yourself as a white supremacist Labane?
Any human who values freedom and is tolerant of other humans regardless of their biological make-up is more valuable to the successful evolution of the human race than someone who doesnât. Iâll let you figure out for yourself who the intolerant ones are and how dangerous their ideology is, and no they are obviously not all in the ME, even though thatâs where the ideology is most prevalent.
Not in the slightest.
Hmmmmm 
Do you not realise ISIS are islamic supremacists and every bit as evil as the nazis?
donât get it
What has that to do with anything?
Ive never seen you condemn them. So you agree? How do you propose they be dealt with?
You appear to have comprehension problems if you think I am advocating white supremacy. My opinion is that all hate speech should be banned, and that includes religions that preach hate. Lefties like yourself are completely hypocritical on this point.
Theres only only problem with your argument @labane 1917
Its called Donald Trump. Hes just as right wing as them other cunts and his language can also be seen as incitement
I donât think you realise you are, but then youâre also not smart enough to see that youâre proposing nazi-esque measures, Tweedledumb.
Should hate speech be banned or not?
What are you yapping about? I was pointing out Tweedledumbâs hypocrisy. Thatâs what I was discussing. Stay on topic.
Iâm not a Trump supporter, but what he is saying is being totally misrepresented by the media (controlled by both parties and both parties want him out of the race), combined with the fact he is not a professional politician, so puts his foot in his mouth regularly. On immigration, what I think he is trying to say is there should be better controls in place so that criminals or radicalized muslims cannot enter the country easily. Itâs easy to say of course, not so easy to accomplish.
Answer the question then pinky, should hate speech be banned or not? If so, what categories of hate speech? Should religion get a free pass? Youâre the one being hypocritical, you just donât realize it.
What has your question got to with my point that youâre a hypocrite?
Haha the clown that drags America into every conversation says stay on topic. You canât even condemn ISIS its ok pal, they wont find you here
It resolves the question of who is a hypocrite. The fact that you wonât answer the question suggests you are the hypocrite to anyone who can reason. Itâs a simple question, should hate speech be outlawed?