Iâm on about the chap you retweeted. Seems like a self-centred bigot.
Seems like a grand fella.
Proper citizen journalism there.
Thatâs the kind of thing the No campaign will be seething has got out.
Theyâre desperately trying to deny their links to conservative Catholic nut jobbery but theyâll have a very hard time of doing so after that display.
It was like something out of Father Ted.
A pity he wants babies murdered.
If I was on the no side Iâd say Iâd be embarrassed and certainly unhappy with that shower, 100% that itâs more damaging than positive to the campaign, the crowd of loolaas that theyâd be speaking to wouldnât need any convincing
The type of people who vote yes wonât be the ones looking after their elderly parents in their latter years, theyâll be the ones trying to push them along to deathâs door in order to get their hands on their inheritance and continue to try and eradicate any morality or appreciation of human life.
Those who love their parents will vote no.
It gets weirder and weirder with you,
2 Likes
Iâm not the weirdo angling for killing healthy babies of healthy mothers - thatâs you.
Really 
Yes. They donât value human life, they only value what is good for them not the ones they should be willing to love and cherish.
Really
They may be great for looking up Minges but their knowledge of the law is non existemt
Have you read that article?
It doesnât promote in any shape or form giving healthy women with nothing wrong with them the ârightâ to exterminate their baby.
Its also an interview with Savitas father, not Savita.
1 Like
Calling you out? I predicted exactly what you would do you stupid cunt, and you took the bait. Hook, line and sinker. You really are a fucking gimp, a dithering gimp with a penchant for dogshit photos.
We have nothing to learn from Indians on this one. The amount of rape and murder of woman that occurs there is shocking to say the least. Read this one on the Guardian earlier.
1 Like
Youâre denying reality again, mate.
No change there.
I didnât say you âcalled me outâ 
Iâm not Tupac!
Jesus Christ this is stage 12 stuff, I was minding my own business,
Iâm only here for a bit of craic mate, youâve lost tne plot
1 Like
Assuming the 8th is repealed does that mean the same thing will never happen again! The legislation being proposed is to allow abortions up to 12 weeks is it not. In the savita case she asked for an abortion. The doctors refused because they felt there was no risk. Would that not still be the case unless her life is at risk? Is it not already law that if the mothers life is in danger abortions take place. This happens here already doesnt it! Iâll be voting to repeal but find using the Savita case to be a bit disingenuous. The doctors thought there was no risk. What happens when some mother to be having complications panics and requests an abortion. Should the hospital just say fuck it thats what she wants and do it or should they assure her that things are going to be fine!
Mr Harris said that beyond the first 12 weeks, terminations would only be available in exceptional circumstances.
These include where there is a risk of serious harm to the health or life of the woman, in emergency situations and in cases of fatal foetal abnormality.
The Protection of Life During Pregnancy Act 2013 already deals with cases where pregnancy endangers a womanâs life does it not.
1 Like