BBC, meanwhile, havenât been as forthcoming with their ratings but confirmed a peak audience of half a million toThe Journal yesterday.
The 42 contacted BBC for further details, to which a spokesperson responded: âWe donât routinely publish audience figures for individual programmes.â
Sir, â Your player ratings including bench and bainisteoir were Cork 105, Clare 129. In the actual match, Clare prevailed after extra time by a single point.
Limerick uncharacteristically stood off the Cork defence.
But Limerick were so casual on the day, particularly for the first 20 of the second half, it still makes no sense. Players were literally walking around. I donât know if there was an arrogance there or if the body wasnât willing for a few boys but itâs the oddest thing Iâve seen with this group⌠Cork punished them then every single time the other end.
But that Cork defence was wide open on the day and thatâs why many felt Clare had a great shot at winning. Cork wonât win anything with that defence. They wonât even get out of Munster next year.
Player ratings are typically dumb. Over egging the winners and underselling the losers. I saw somewhere yesterday, maybe the Examiner, and it was all 6s and 5s for Cork yet 7s and 8s for Clare, but only a puck of a ball between them. A pure case always of skewing the report to suit the narrative.
Great viewing figures, the most watched game of hurling of all time surely. What was it about that fine Limerick side that meant they never really captured the interest of the wider public I wonder?