Where have I rattled on about big pharma.
The average age of death from this is about 82. Iâd say the vast majority of them are already on a cocktail of drugs.
I think their approach is wrong too even though its easy for us hurling on the ditch and still hard for us to pinpoint what the right one is. But if you think their intention is not just about saving lives youâve gone full anti establishment. Or at least are a good bit of the way there. Thatâs all I was saying. Do you think this whole thing has changed your outlook on life a bit?
Lads have conditioned themselves to whatever the state broadcaster tells them. Anything else is heresy, superstition, and must be bate down with a google search to find something to discredit practical knowledge and common sense. Itâs like a cult
2 Likes
the median age of those admitted to ICU is 62. Old and already sick people have a worse outcome, absolutely. No doubt.
That is not a great number if you are able to give any bit of objective thought to it at all. But you are so far gone you canât.
I think their intention is to avoid any finger pointing. If they wanted to maximise lives saved theyâd push for vitamin d ads and theyâd have built up more capacity in system and not let it go since summer.
The cancer scandal and postponed and cancelled cancer treatment is going to shorten a lot of lives.
Has it changed my perspective on things - people i know being sick has - the government and HSE response to Covid, not so much. It will be interesting to look back on the mass hysteria and how political decision making is so flawed.
1 Like
I was very impressed with Boris last night. A grim message to deliver but he also channelled the blitz spirit and emphasised they have priority groups jabbed by mid-February to gave people some hope.
Thought he was looking trim too.
Jesus itâs changed mine big time. I would have been starting with a low bar for politicians but Iâve less belief in politicians and medical experts etc than I ever had. I firmly believe nobody has a clue now.
1 Like
There are people out there whoâd rather see people die than consider an alternative. All I did was alert the forum to the outstanding results experienced and witnessed by hundreds of frontline doctors.
Iâd say there werenât too many people objecting to life saving treatment because some paper or other hadnât been peer reviewed.
But have at it people are free to live in fear and buy into the lockdown theoryâŚeven if it hasnât been successful, clinically trialled, peer reviewed etc. Strange
Yeah I said that to glenshane before. He has cast iron 100pc belief in some experts and zero in others. No one has a clue imo. Should cap salaries at 50k and pull solutions to problems out of a hat.
Youâre seething
youâre a garden variety tfk idiot.
Youâd deny a sick person life saving treatment because it breaks with the preaching of rte. Have you provides vitamin d and zinc for your nearest and dearest?
go on away now and ring your bell. Idiot
Resorting to insults and abuse, lashing out etc.
Sad really.
Iâll lash away, idiot
Itâs a good job we learned our lesson from the first wave and have expanded the number of ICU and ordinary beds available to deal with another surge. Well done to the HSE.
15 Likes
He has access to the type of crackpots that you can only find after years of refinement by the YouTube algorithm
They havenât done any of these things.