You’re talking about Spain now, you said Italy a second ago. The outbreak in Italy really kicked off at the end of February and you said the airports should have been closed then.
We also know there were documented cases earlier in Europe (from January and early February). And we now know it was in France in December. So how well would this have really worked?
Were you calling for international travel to stop at an unprecedented level in December before anyone knew the virus existed?
Do I believe that a country that implemented zero travel restrictions from known hot spots have a lower transmission rate from travel than a country that did by a factor of 30? Ludicrous to believe that 3% figure but you seem to.
I said the airports should have been shut 6/7 weeks earlier than they were. The gov were calling for people to come back from Spain 6/7 weeks after they should have shut down the airports.
When the outbreak started in Italy and got serious very quickly, that was the time for Government to take action. Ireland as a small island on the west coast of Europe had every advantage going to insulate itself from the virus, it reacted too late.
Of course it’s nonsense, I picked up on it straight away and the NZ figure further proves what a farcical figure it is.
As to why they would lie? Why would a country that were one of the only countries in the world not to introduce travel restrictions say that travel related transmission was low? Sheesh, I dunno Tim, maybe to hide incompetency?
It has massive geographical and demographical advantages that could have controlled the outbreak of this virus.
It made grave mistakes at the beginning. Maybe the horsey set dance to the tune of the UK, but the EU seem to call the shots, unless of course it comes to collecting a €13bn tax bill from a large MNC.