Coronavirus Thread (sponsored by Anthony Fauci & Pfizer) (Part 5)

Vigilance and a abundance of caution is needed

:roll_eyes:

They were the exact words Luke O’Neill used on the radio on Sunday morning. Are you more qualified than him to issue a different judgement?

The pubs will be packed this weekend all over the country… Lads slobbering and spraying everywhere while talking rubber and downing 10 pints. Home then to families or significant others and farting and slobbering all over the place again. Fucking drink is the real pandemic in Ireland.

5 Likes

The Masked waitress and the Unmasked head of the Health Service is quite dystopian

3 Likes

You keep making definitive pronouncements on this. You’re wrong, the vaccines we are working with are single or two shot vaccines based on how they were trialled and licensed. And secondly, there is absolutely no evidence to suggest the third time’s the charm and no further boosters will be needed. It seems most likely it will wear off in six months or a year again - which of course is grand, it’s still functional and we can boost again - but making pronouncements that the third shot is the full stop is just silly at this stage.

I asked you a simple question. You didn’t answer it.

Now you’re telling Luke O’Neill he’s wrong in what he says about the vaccines.

Eh hasn’t Luke O’Neill been proven wrong on vaccines already?

2 Likes

Remember when Luke O’Neill said masks were pointless?

1 Like

Self-hating buffoons resorting to Ewanisms now thinking they’re clever.

Never change, TFK.

1 Like

Professor O’Neill retweeted the table and added: ‘No end to the good vaccine news today- 5 vaccines give 100% protection against severe disease.’

@Juhniallio

He’s at it again.

Sure you’ve told us repeatedly that Luke O’Neill is wrong about zero covid. Are you more qualified than Luke O’Neill to talk about zero covid?

I’ll repeat, making definitive pronouncements that a third shot is final - that "it’s a three shot vaccine - is without basis at this stage. And I’d say likely to be wrong.

You still haven’t answered the question.

The other question you ask is not relevant to his core topic of expertise, it’s a mainly political and ideological question.

This question is a question on his core topic of expertise.

On which you now claim to have more expertise than him.

Why do you keep quoting scientologists like Tomas Ryan if zero covid is a political and ideological question? That’s mad.

2 Likes

I got a right laugh out of you saying the word “scientologist”.

Projection is a very bad thing.

Maybe if you actually listened to the very sensible things Ryan has been saying all pandemic you might open your mind and be less of a cultist to failed ideology?

Scientician? I didn’t say scientist cause he’s a lunatic. You’re the expert on failed ideology though, like for example, zero covid.

Ah yeah, anybody who doesn’t subscribe to your failed ideology is a “lunatic” now.

Go and read some Mark Paul telling us it’s safe to have a meaningful Christmas.

That doesn’t make any sense as a rejoinder. The failed ideology is zero covid. You’re the one that signed up to that set of beliefs and refuses to reconsider them because you’re a cultist.

Is there anything you can do for the missed time? Jesus I knew childcare is an awful pain and cost but didn’t know this.

Ah yeah, the failed ideology you’ve admitted many times actually works.

How do you keep a straight face while doing that? :grin: