Your only down here to suffer, an old saying but it’s probably the only true equality that there is.
Mate, there is only the here and now. Live your life to the full now and you will be eternally happy.
Easier said then done pal, but I am getting there. I have a great life to be honest but the human mind always tends to focus more on the negative rather then the positive. It’s about making the best of things really as no matter who you are nothings ever perfect in my experience anyway.
Down where?
That’s what they said during the Celtic Tiger.
Very true
Ah, come on Totti, it’s like you’re taunting me!
the sanctity of marriage must be protected at all costs
What about this presidential age one? Load of shite. I’ll be voting no anyway.
What better way of protecting the sanctity of marriage than allowing all humans to marry 
Us Irish are a great bunch of lads, and gals.
[QUOTE=“ChocolateMice, post: 1143687, member: 168”]What better way of protecting the sanctity of marriage than allowing all humans to marry
Us Irish are a great bunch of lads, and gals.[/QUOTE]
All humans are allowed marry, as is.
Let’s hope we don’t let the gays bully us into allowing their sham marriages.
[QUOTE=“Nembo Kid, post: 1143688, member: 2514”]All humans are allowed marry, as is.
Let’s hope we don’t let the gays bully us into allowing their sham marriages.[/QUOTE]
I’d imagine the divorce rate would spike imagine 2 queens having a domestic
If you want to protect the sanctity of marriage, get rid of divorce.
The banning of rape within marriage ruined its sanctity.
incorrect, the ability to escape will always be one of marriages strengths. the trust and commitment required in this regard is what the sanctity of marriage is all about. very naive to assume locking people in will make them respect their surroundings.
however letting every fucked up tom dick and harry weird cunt in to make them feel better about their creepy little idiosyncrasies only dilutes the natural pureness of marriage
there will be some very undignified fighting in the courts over poodles and fucking bichon friches
I presume the sanctity of marriage will remain as is as there won’t be any gays getting married in churches
[QUOTE=“HBV*, post: 1143719, member: 234”]incorrect, the ability to escape will always be one of marriages strengths. the trust and commitment required in this regard is what the sanctity of marriage is all about. very naive to assume locking people in will make them respect their surroundings.
however letting every fucked up tom dick and harry weird cunt in to make them feel better about their creepy little idiosyncrasies only dilutes the natural pureness of marriage[/QUOTE]
So you can escape marriage yet it is also pure?
Yes. But it only became pure in 1991 when divorce came in.