no they wouldnt have, the evidence proved it couldnt have been them.
The bruising and scars would have meant that the Jury wouldnt have taken the confessions and a jury wouldnt have bought into the "they beat themselves up"lie either
They need a Jerry Springer type security arrangement here .
This Catherine Martin one & her facial expressions.
Someone robbed the neck off Michael Fitzmaurice
Is this the only time the SCC got it wrong?
Reading up on it here and clearly a miscarriage of Justice. At least the State recognised that retrospectively but no comfort to the families/ prisoners
An absolute head the ball
6 Likes
Mick has the dinner in the middle of the day and again in the evening.
5 Likes
Wheres this lad from?
What the fuck was that California reference?
‘there is evidence there now in science’
Roscommon I think. He drives a digger.
Michael, I’m completely confused. What are you saying?
1 Like
Colm Murphy
Nice use of the word “agin” by Michael
The state of yer man’s teeth.
I think when Ming first left for Europe he endorsed Mick for his seat and Mick won it, but they subsequently fell out over a few things. Ming’s been canvassing for Thomas Pringle in Donegal and Saoirse McHugh in Mayo, but he never mentions Mick any more.
SCC tries gangland/organized crime stuff too. I’d not fancy being a juror on a Kinahan trial and being left to my own devices when trial was over.
2 Likes
Mike Mike Mike
I’d say they were both on the side of the turf cutters during the campaigns a few years back
1 Like
Jack wouldn’t know a cow if he got a belt of a shitty tail
1 Like
As I mentioned earlier, a lad earlier today was convicted in relation to the Hutch-Kinihan thing.
I will listen to that podcast tomorrow @Little_Lord_Fauntleroy but a conviction from 45 years ago won’t change my mind on the SCC