Do you know whats in the report?
Was Mr McAnespie killed in Eire or Northern Ireland?
The FG Minister for Justice wonât let it be released.
He is denying the familyâs bid to get justice.
British State terrorism, sponsored by Fine Gael.
The family were told of its outline as per that article.
You have no idea what is in it so. So there might be no evidence of a cover up at all? But there definitely is evidence of the ira taking retribution against people who assist authorities they donât like.
So you voted for SF who embraced the killers of jerry mccabe at an ard fheis, have you no issue with that?
The family are adamant they want it, their legal team have consistently said it would be absolutely vital is securing a prosecution.
I know that the family want it, their legal team believe it is crucial to their case in getting a conviction against the killer and I know that the FG Minister for Justice will not release this report.
Itâs in line with FG and their reprehensible inaction on the worst terrorist atrocity the free state has seen. They have been covering up British State terrorism on this island for nearly a century, they recently tried to hold a commemoration for British terrorists in this island and their record on justice in this state is absolutely sickening. Look how FG deal with Garda whistleblowers.
1 Like
I donât vote. There was only one killer of McCabe.
The danger to people who spoke to authorities is clear, the family might want it but if people spoke only on a guarantee of anonymity that canât be ignored. Because of SF/IRAs warped view of justice lives wpuld be at stake.
Why not? How else would you propose to change government or at least hold them to account?
Ok, so youâre now saying nobody should ever comply with an investigation.
30 years on, what dangers exist?
Where did i say this?
30 years is nothing, the families area till livibg there
so if they apolgise its ok then?
forget the past?
Well thatâs the reason you give and you either believe that applies unilaterally or youâre a hypocrite.
I asked you what dangers exist 30+ years on?
What are you talking about?
The danger exists now as SF/IRA still have scum and associates in their ranks, in leading positions
Is it not the case that the investigation into Mr McAnespieâs death was reopened in recent years and a former British Army was charged with manslaughter and is awaiting trial?
Is it? Well thats the end of that then
So why the rush for the report so, to identify âcollaboratersâ?
Iâve asked you what dangers now exist?
Can you not answer that question as it appears to be the basis on your whole argument.
You have defended Flanagan thwarting a familyâs bid for justice but youâre then contradicting yourself on the same basis seconds later. Should nobody comply with an investigation because they are in danger?
To secure a conviction.
No, but people should be able to give information knowing that their identities wonât be shared with murderous scum against their wishes. Very brave of them to say anything.
We have a litany of what FG deem acceptable: tens of thousands homeless, over 70 years of institution abuse, covering up both corruption and state wrongdoing leading to deaths such as Brigid McCole and Emma Mhic MhathĂșna.
We also know tying people to landmines, fascism and Garda malpractice are all acceptable to the blueshirts.
1 Like
Sure theres a trial upcoming, clearly plenty of evidence and there mighy well be a conviction. Theres no need to name people who spoke to authorities at all