Not everyone can be Paul Rouse.
Colour is fine⦠bias is different.
Anyway, my podcast will be on connected histories rather than a point A to point B story.
In some cases there will be strong links connecting different strands of history. At other times it will be extremely vague or even made up.
So listeners will be getting 4 or 5 historical events rolled into one ![]()
You should put it on patreon
For the price of a coffee?
Depends on the coffee.
A coffee in Belarus
Youāre man Finn Dwyer started one of his series like that, maybe the WOI one, but never really followed through on it
The steamerā¦
I can bring native Americans into the Limerick drug fued.
Cross dressing Irish rebels into Asian Indian death cults.
And you can listen to it all for the small sum of a Latvian coffee
If you want guests i know a few volunteers, if you catch my drift
What youāre advocating for is what David McWilliams is to economists with all his terms like breakfast roll man to make it more accessible for the likes of @Arthur. We simply canāt be dumbing things down like that.
The Lakota gowls waited in the bushes of the peopleās park, their Kettlebell hewn torsos ready to knock six shades of shit out of the next e scooter that passed byā¦
That sounds very blindboyish Iām afraid
Is he still going? The difference is heās a money hungry spoofer whereas Iāll be providing legit sources for my spoofing.
So itās just your life story?
On the IRA episode and i donāt like how they switched immediately from saying the UDA murdered around 400 innocent catholic civilians to reinforcing the IRA were the biggest killers in the conflict.
You should stop listening, itās only annoying you ![]()
Iām enjoying it. Itās good to listen to things you donāt agree with.
Or that most of the curremt noise around investigations relate to murders by the British Army - there is a very good reason for that
Honest to God lads
Itās like weāre listening to this show to get offended ![]()
Youre correct that alternativee arguments are a good way of challenging your own biases⦠However, thereās a difference in not agreeing with arguments or points of view -ā¦versus when someone is misrepresenting what happened to suit a narrative.
Takes a certain IQ level to pick up on the difference.