How was that not a foul on Matthews?
[quote=“Rocko, post: 831692, member: 1”]It’s not futile anyway. Even if you think it’s not that important.
Stokes unlucky there, only off by a fraction of a yard.[/quote]
Mr. Zeman said it was and I agree with him.
How is that a yellow for Izzy and McHattie’s not even a foul.
Gollum is the worst referee on the planet.
The Hearts keeper can barely jump.
You or Mr Zeman don’t understand the word futile. That suggests you can’t win if you have possession, what you mean is that it’s not an advantage which is also wrong.
We could get a bad injury in this game with the inept refereeing. Every decision seems to be a compensation for the previous one he got wrong.
Possession is futile, it’s your use of possession that counts.
You still don’t understand futile.
I think we’re playing some nice stuff here. Midfield two are sitting and ensuring we’re in control. The front 4 are combining well and looking increasingly dangerous. Virgil is having another terrific game at the back.
Christ what a brutal referee. McGowan manhandled him out of the way to have a go at Boerrigter and Willie speaks to both players. Never a free out in the first place.
Hopefully this is just a superficial knock for Adam.
Commons seems to have been moved to the right and Sammy playing through the middle. Would have kept it the same as it was and just switched Boerrigter to the right and let Sammy in his best position on the left as well as keeping Commons in the centre.
Is Kayal still injured by the way?
Stokes is such a creative player. He is an outstanding talent.
He wasn’t mentioned in reports yesterday as being injured but hard to think he wouldn’t be on the bench instead of one of the attackers if he was fit.
I do. Having possession is not the cause or producing something, it’s being audacious or daring in possession that produces something - it’s the attitude and expression - not the possession itself.
Zeman is right, but you fail to understand him. It seems to me that you are trying to say that having more possession is the cause of winning games, what Zeman is saying that having possession is futile when you have a conservative approach.
[quote=“Rudi, post: 831722, member: 1052”]I do. Having possession is not the cause or producing something, it’s being audacious or daring in possession that produces something - it’s the attitude and expression - not the possession itself.
Zeman is right, but you fail to understand him. It seems to me that you are trying to say that having more possession is the cause of winning games, what Zeman is saying that having possession is futile when you have a conservative approach.[/quote]
This is really boring and I won’t be engaging further.
Izzy needed to make that ball back to Commons. Poor execution.
Fuck sake.
Took a deflection there but I thought Forster might have dived.
Sammy should have scored there.
Forster needs to be dropped.