I’ve read a passage or two before. I’d say there are bits that would qualify as social anthropology, probably before the field was even really known about.
Will not spoof… I know little about Arabia Deserta except that it is travel writing (of apparently the kind you broach) and was a huge influence on one of my favourite writers, Henry Green.
I think a lot of people put off reading certain books: Ulysses, Moby-Dick, Gravity’s Rainbow, Black Lamb and Grey Falcon. Another one is Arabia Deserta.
My experience is that such effort is well spent. So…
I think what takes it beyond a lot of travel writing was he spent time living with the Bedouin people, as opposed to just writing about them from afar. That’s where I’m probably linking it a little towards social anthropology, even if Doughty wouldn’t have considered himself an anthropologist (and I’m not sure if others have either!). On the other hand, you’d have someone like Malinowski who was very much an anthropologist and probably would have scoffed at notions of being called a travel writer. As with all labels or fields of writing, the boundaries are somewhat blurred.
Yep. And spot on about blurring, I think. But you know far more about all this area than I do.
Anthropology, in a.funny way, is the 20th century’s key discipline. TS Eliot, say, was most influenced by anthropology, in strong sense. Claude Lévi-Strauss prompted decades of literary theory.
And Freud is essentially an inverted anthropologist.
Ah, I wouldn’t say that at all. I’m no anthropologist myself, but have dipped in and out of bits. It’s all cross-disciplinary anyway; as you said, you can see its influence on literary and critical theory, psychoanalysis, sociology, and so on.
Funny enough, I gave over two hours yesterday evening in Lackagh Church at Phelim Murphy’s removal. Time I was more than happy to give, with that friend. Extraordinarily massive crowd.