Hard luck on the conversation. Pick an easier topic for yourself next time.
Picking out typos as youâre stumped. As I said, enjoy your garrison game played by your British team this weekend. 
Oh it was a typo! Of course it was.
Weak even for you.
Back to British Telecom Sports for you to watch your beloved British soccer team. 
I hate when the pseudo intellectual hard nosed revisionist types betray their soft feelings and get all emotive in debates. 3 unprompted and irrelevant mentions of a Celtic match in 3 posts on a debate about something else. I believe seething is the TFK parlance to describe Tim here.
10 Likes
Oooooft
3 Likes
Sure weâre pretty much beits as it is ffs
Why was he because he got the republic
Did he not object to it and caused a civil war because he didnât want any part of Ireland to be in the common-wealth?
Do they have this silly debate in the USA. ??
1 Like
You have. No added to the debate read what it is
3 Likes
Oooft
You donât know what pseudo intellectual means.
You canât debate so look for typos, which is ironic given the above label.
Either debate or get out, there are many Republics in the Commonwealth. All countries have their good points and bad points.
2 Likes
It wasnât a Commonwealth at the time. The Irish Free State helped change that.
Youâre dead to me
You and everyone else keep banging on about what a shit country Australia is, so itâs hardly a great example. Weâre still full of horrible, right wing, racist, homophobic, climate change denying, racist, monsrch loving, racist, bad beer drinking, racist pricks. So I wouldnât be using it as a sop to a commonwealth argument, or even worse, as a pathetically inept attempted clamping if one if the forums leading members of the IRA, @Little_Lord_Fauntleroy
Fuck off with your fucking commonwealth. Iâll Bomb your fucking commonwealth and all the pricks in it.
1 Like
Ooooifffttt
Swap empire for common wealth⌠And you know what I meant.
The very definition of republicanism rejects monarchies so that would be the most obvious reason.