Theyāre lovely policy documents, art. Are there any figures available for the number of civil servants that have actually been fired for under-performance though? I canāt find any figures for 2014-2017 but the number of civil servants fired between 2007-2014 is 55 (fifty-five). It is undisclosed how many of those were for under-performance unfortunately but at an average of just under 8 per year in that time-frame then one would have to believe that they are performing at an unreal level. Almost unbelievable actually.
OāBrien resigns but should he not have been sacked? He gets to keep his pension. Same with Noirin OāSullivan and Callinan before her. When there are no consequences for incompetence, fraud or corruption then it will continue to happen. Those that are being sacked have to be taking the absolute piss and are usually grunt level anyway.
A lot of people that do not pass probation would resign having had a āperhaps this is not the right career for youā chat with a member of management, rather than it being forced through the formal process.
yes, the new procedures are in a post to horsebox above. with pmds now, you only have 2 findings: satisfactory or unsatisfactory so its easier to get into the (new) disclipinary process and (new) managing underperformance.
the 36 is coming from my memory, Iād seen it in a document