He got 57% while up against the worst shower of wankers to ever run ā¦ A very poor showing.
Nobody was thrown against him, which was rather the point.
The major parties refused to contest.
He got 57% of the lowest turnout in years you clown.
Thatās even worse - people didnt want to come out and vote for him.
Okay. 
Despite having the incumbent main party behind him, the second party not bothering, the third party half assing it and the Labour Party grassroots there for him.
It really isnāt that spectacular, however you want to dress it up.
Who said it was spectacular? He has won. End of debate.
Thatās the truth of it ā¦ People didnt want to vote for him but didnt want to vote for any of the other wankers eitherā¦ They stayed away in drovesā¦ What was the turn out, 45 % - when you add in the votes for the other candidates - thatās a hell of a lot of people who didnt vote for him.
A hell of a lot of clowns who got hoodwinked by a Traveller hater.
Didnāt know you were running harry
2 Likes
@Tim_Riggins engaging in his usual whataboutery tonight. Introducing irrelevant points to validate a completely pointless stance. Par for the course.
1 Like
As stated earlier the *Snow Flakes took a hell of a beating. *SF
In your opinion. Plenty others have their own interpretation of results.
1 Like
I am everywhere.
Stating I think Kenny should have ran and would have done well is not an outrageous point on an election thread.
1 Like
Itās pretty lazy to put this down to āTraveller hatingā
The turnout was so low because it was a foregone conclusion that Mickey D would win.
The other 5 candidates were woeful.
1 Like
Start an imaginary Election thread and weāll amuse you if you want.
Youāre using it to deflect away from the actual results as they donāt suit your agenda