Has he not already.
Our God.
…and there you have it. 2,333 patients treated with HCQ, 91.6% improved clinically. Almost all the deaths recorded (63) were in a VA hospital where patients were already severely ill.
Some naivety from a man who dismisses God.
Stick to God bothering, idiot.
I just find it funny how a chap like you who outright dismisses the chance of there being a God despite the fact you have no basis for that will believe any sort of nonsense report that science throws at you, despite the fact they’ll be contradicting themselves in a matter of weeks.
I actually believe there is a God, I just dismiss the chance of your Abrahambic God, as it is based on fairytales from the minds of delusional sheep herders.
Science is based on evidence, not fairytales. Also, get the fuck out of this thread as it is not a discussion on fake religions.
I think that’s very dubious given how often scientists have their evidence based theories proven wrong.
You’re a bit of a dimwit so I wouldn’t expect the penny to drop with you.
Yes, theories get updated and sometimes replaced as we learn more. That’s the way science works. Unlike your crazy religion, absolute beliefs with no evidence.
You have an absolute ignorance of science, but fairly typical of religious nutters sadly.
Science is the equivalent of a dog chasing its tail.
God’s message is to cherish and enjoy the gift of life, to live as good human beings - maybe that’s why it brings up so much resentment from you and other atheists.
I’m not an atheist.
Science and religion have nothing to do with each other. One is a study of the natural world based on evidence, the other is a set of beliefs based on fantasy. Only idiots cannot tell the difference.
Yet you blindly believe scientific reports you could not have possibly verified.
If you were a bit more intelligent you might recognise that it is you who is the idiot.
I don’t blindly believe anything. Science is not based on belief.
I can’t help you further, goodbye.
Oh but you do.
Unless you have verified every single scientific report you put forward as proof, then that means you rely on a belief system. I’m going back to my initial post here - you are an extremely gullible and naive chap.
Some encouraging news out of Spain on hydroxychloroquine treatment. This is the largest study I have seen, 166 patients aged from 18-85. 48.8% of those not treated with HCQ died, versus 22% of those treated with HCQ. The significant conclusion however is that HCQ only increases survival if administered in the early stages of the disease, this would suggest it has anti-viral properties and is slowing viral reproduction and/or is limiting the cytokine storm responsible for a lot of deaths.
2 Likes
Great news. Hopefully we find a cocktail soon to get that IFR down.
A really strong bloody mary, with loads of Tabasco. That should do it.
… and a baby aspirin. There’s some pretty interesting new reporting that COVID-19 is a blood clotting disease as well as a respiratory disease, and blood thinners are helping the sickest patients.
1 Like
Do you really believe every non peer reviewed puff piece which agrees with your bias?
2 Likes
What bias would that be mate? My only bias is to see fewer people die, whats yours?
Here’s a less puff piece for your consideration.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/05/07/blood-thinners-coronavirus-clots/
You appear to have an issue with doctors trying treatment options to save lives, a very odd position given there is no approved treatment for COVID-19. The blood thinner study was done on 2,733 patients with advanced disease in Mount Sinai in New York. 63% died who did not receive the treatment versus 29% who received the treatment.
Worth trying or not in your considered opinion?
1 Like