Read back over your posts here this evening, pal. Itâs yourself who has been grumbling non-stop.
Itâs lovely to know Jeremy Corbyn, Che Guevara and myself annoy you so much. Youâre more than welcome to continue idolising Timmy Dooley.
Read back over your posts here this evening, pal. Itâs yourself who has been grumbling non-stop.
Itâs lovely to know Jeremy Corbyn, Che Guevara and myself annoy you so much. Youâre more than welcome to continue idolising Timmy Dooley.
Itâs hilarious to see these fucking neoliberal idiots giving advice on what Corbyn should do when he single-handedly revived both the party and the entire ideology the party is supposed to stand for.
There was some serious reality inversion in the Observer at the weekend:
Those âthird wayâ cocksuckers destroyed democratic socialism over the past 30 years, and the centre left with it. Their embrace of neoliberalism is why the centre left is such a mess now. Corbyn has not only made Labour the most popular part in Britain, but a he has made a truly social democratic party the most popular party in the UK precisely because he never sold out to their bullshit.
And now these chattering class idiots whoâve been wrong about everything want to lecture people on what Labour should do, and they genuinely believe that people should listen to them. Ignoring them is precisely why Corbynâs Labour is on the brink of power and the Tories are totally fucked.
A politician in a country I donât live in
A politician who was dead before I was born
An internet weirdo
Something about another politician I donât remember ever referring to.
Wow, you zinged me
A politician you took the trouble to post a hatchet job article about withut anybody prompting you.
A freedom fighter you took the trouble to comment on without anybody prompting you.
Itâs INTERNET, pal.
Here, pal. Took about 8 seconds to bring it up.
I did indeed.
Hatchet job? A mildly critical opinion-piece at worst
âFreedom fighterâ referenced in the same article. Vicious takedown alright
An article referring to Timmy Dooley. Where I idolized him, I suppose?
You seem to be taking all this terribly to heart, mate.
Donât worry, itâs only the INTERNET.
Youâre really boring me now, and you seem very eager to have the last word on this, so, go on, have it.
Oooft
You are unhinged.
You can hate Tony Blair for going to war all you want, but his Labour governmentâs poured money into public services. That is an objective fact. Barring his first and last year in charge, Labour increased public services spending by 6% annually. The UK went from spending the 22nd highest amount of their national income on public services to the 6th highest to 10 in the OECD during the Blair/Brown years. The UK was during the Blair years the country in the OECD with the second highest rate of spending increase. During Brownâs Premiership, they were the country with the fourth largest increase (GRRR Austerity), making them number 1 for the period of 1997-2010.
At times it seems like Jeremy Corbyn and his followers on twitter are more interested in holding the Tony Blair administrations accountable than the current Conservative administration
The thing about a guy like you is that you donât have a fucking clue what neo liberal means. Blair was neo liberal (letâs set aside his war) in the sense that he believed in free markets - meaning capital and labour into the UK. He saw the generation gap in the UK and coupled with efforts to weaken the Franco-German alliance in the EU, pushed for the EU to move east. This brought lots of young labour into the British market to replace the old, legally. He did this to keep the British economy growing, to actually pay for the increases in public services he wanted. He was basically employeeing the Swedish model on a grand scale, but youâre too fucking thick to see that.
Yet while on the one hand youâll blast Blair for neo liberalism, which broader integration and immigration was a huge part off, youâre the exact time to throw around the term racist at a UKIP voter.
In case you didnât notice @Watch_The_Break, the âLeftâ has been a mess for decades. Thatâs because by the 1970s British economy was totally shagged after years of Labour (and Conservative) policies. The âleftâ of Corbyn has been proven to be an unmitigated disaster in every place it touches. The softer left, that of Scandinavia & indeed Germany, has a stronger argument for success than these loopers you support. But Viva la Revolution I guess.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIgiV8yn3xU
This is when the âleftâ was a mess. Watch and learn.
Yeah but itâs not proper Socialism⌠like Venezuela.
Corbyn has been shown to be on the right side of history regarding the North.
On the left side surely
Like not supporting the Anglo Irish Agreement?
Thereâs a rotten, treasonous streak in these supposed Irishmen who applaud the Tory record on Northern Ireland. The Toryâs position is all but indistinguishable from that of the DUP, who regard the Irish as subhuman. Even today Unionism is awash with Eugenicist philosophy. Check out Richard Lynn who was a professor at the University of Ulster.
Fair play to Corbyn for always having stood against these racist scumbags.
How does not supporting the Anglo Irish Treaty put him on the right side of history?
The law and order lads rooting for the side that murdered defence lawyers. You couldnât make it up.
Can you not answer questions?
Is Corbyn even still alive? hiding out the back with Sinn Fein/IRA as usual when there is serious political issues to be dealt with